PPA only provides packages for the latest LTS release. the upstream bug report seems stalled: https://github.com/semiosis/glusterfs-debian/issues/7
See the build log at https://launchpadlibrarian.net/198231851/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-amd64.glusterfs_3.6.2-ubuntu1~precise2_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
upstream patch : http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10014/
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/10014 committed in release-3.6 by Raghavendra Bhat (raghavendra) ------ commit ae75db655b683bb47df1590c7815c90b7cbefe4b Author: kkeithle <kkeithle.usersys.redhat.com> Date: Thu Mar 26 11:55:57 2015 -0400 rdma: RDMA_OPTION_ID_REUSEADDR undeclared on Ubuntu Precise (LTS) Very old release of Ubuntu LTSwq Change-Id: Ib6fb4493f1f34ba853bd74c8037da7663639f40e BUG: 1201484 Signed-off-by: kkeithle <kkeithle.usersys.redhat.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/10014 Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins.com> Reviewed-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos> Reviewed-by: Raghavendra Bhat <raghavendra>
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10028 (build:change dependency for librdmacm to version >= 1.0.15) posted (#1) for review on master by mohammed rafi kc (rkavunga)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10208 (rdma:smoke failure in NetBSD if RDMA_OPTION_ID_REUSEADDR is not defined) posted (#3) for review on release-3.6 by mohammed rafi kc (rkavunga)
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/10208 committed in release-3.6 by Raghavendra Bhat (raghavendra) ------ commit c79d2b6836dc1c7223b90a9bb0af7940963ff0a5 Author: Mohammed Rafi KC <rkavunga> Date: Mon Apr 13 11:55:42 2015 +0530 rdma:smoke failure in NetBSD if RDMA_OPTION_ID_REUSEADDR is not defined By the change http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10014/, we only set reuseaddr option if the macro RDMA_OPTION_ID_REUSEADDR is defined in rdmacma.h . The variable optval is only used in the section where we use conditional compiling based on the macro. So if the macro is not defined, then compiler will throw a warning for optval. Change-Id: I162143c928e84b40c6fd6108d3aa5b045dd9de95 BUG: 1201484 Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/10208 Reviewed-by: Raghavendra Talur <rtalur> Reviewed-by: Sachin Pandit <spandit> Reviewed-by: Raghavendra Bhat <raghavendra> Tested-by: Raghavendra Bhat <raghavendra>