Bug 1202242 - Review Request: rubygem-rb-readline - Pure-Ruby Readline Implementation
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rb-readline - Pure-Ruby Readline Implementation
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: František Dvořák
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-03-16 08:19 UTC by Mamoru TASAKA
Modified: 2015-03-19 09:04 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-03-19 09:04:56 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
valtri: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Mamoru TASAKA 2015-03-16 08:19:57 UTC
Spec URL: https://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/gem-related/rubygem-rb-readline.spec
SRPM URL: https://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/gem-related/rubygem-rb-readline-0.5.2-1.fc.src.rpm
Description: 
The readline library provides a pure Ruby implementation of the GNU readline C
library, as well as the Readline extension that ships as part of the standard
library.

Fedora Account System Username: mtasaka

Koji scratch build
F-23: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9240059
F-22: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9240053
F-21: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9240054

Comment 1 František Dvořák 2015-03-16 13:51:33 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated


===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
     "Unknown or generated".
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gems,
     /usr/share/gems/doc
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Ruby:
[x]: Platform dependent files must all go under %{gem_extdir_mri}, platform
     independent under %{gem_dir}.
[x]: Gem package must not define a non-gem subpackage
[x]: Macro %{gem_extdir} is deprecated.
[x]: Gem package is named rubygem-%{gem_name}
[x]: Package contains BuildRequires: rubygems-devel.
[x]: Gem package must define %{gem_name} macro.
[x]: Pure Ruby package must be built as noarch
[x]: Package does not contain Requires: ruby(abi).

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages.
     Note: Package contains font files
     Note: in generated docs
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Package functions as described.
     OK: ruby -e "require 'rbreadline'; p RbReadline::RB_READLINE_VERSION"
     OK: the example
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

Ruby:
[x]: Specfile should use macros from rubygem-devel package.
[x]: Gem package should exclude cached Gem.
[x]: Gem should use %gem_install macro.
[x]: Test suite should not be run by rake.
[x]: Test suite of the library should be run.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: rubygem-rb-readline-0.5.2-1.fc22.noarch.rpm
          rubygem-rb-readline-doc-0.5.2-1.fc22.noarch.rpm
          rubygem-rb-readline-0.5.2-1.fc22.src.rpm
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
Cannot parse rpmlint output:


Requires
--------
rubygem-rb-readline (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    ruby(rubygems)

rubygem-rb-readline-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    rubygem-rb-readline



Provides
--------
rubygem-rb-readline:
    rubygem(rb-readline)
    rubygem-rb-readline

rubygem-rb-readline-doc:
    rubygem-rb-readline-doc



Source checksums
----------------
https://rubygems.org/gems/rb-readline-0.5.2.gem :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 2b2417d94b75bb868d112cbdaa89986d01ba5af37587bfbbac3ff4d852c034f3
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 2b2417d94b75bb868d112cbdaa89986d01ba5af37587bfbbac3ff4d852c034f3


Generated by fedora-review 0.5.2 (63c24cb) last change: 2014-07-14
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-22-x86_64 -b 1202242
Buildroot used: fedora-22-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Ruby, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG

=====

Package APPROVED!

Comment 2 Mamoru TASAKA 2015-03-17 02:36:54 UTC
Thank you!

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: rubygem-rb-readline
Short Description: Pure-Ruby Readline Implementation
Upstream URL: http://github.com/ConnorAtherton/rb-readline
Owners: mtasaka
Branches: f22 f21
InitialCC:

Comment 3 Gwyn Ciesla 2015-03-17 12:58:58 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 4 Mamoru TASAKA 2015-03-19 09:04:56 UTC
Built on all branches, push requested on F-22/21, closing.

Thank you for review and git prcedure.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.