Bug 1202777 - dnf doesn't handle multilib problems
Summary: dnf doesn't handle multilib problems
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED EOL
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: dnf
Version: 23
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: rpm-software-management
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-03-17 12:32 UTC by Igor Gnatenko
Modified: 2016-11-30 09:08 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-30 09:08:55 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
debugdata (5.52 MB, application/x-xz)
2015-03-17 12:32 UTC, Igor Gnatenko
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1148627 0 high CLOSED dnf doesn't provide enough info to understand the package dependencies 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC

Internal Links: 1148627

Description Igor Gnatenko 2015-03-17 12:32:27 UTC
Created attachment 1002785 [details]
debugdata

yum:
       Protected multilib versions: mesa-libglapi-10.6.0-0.devel.2.f80af89.fc23.i686 != mesa-libglapi-10.6.0-0.devel.450.970dc23.fc23.x86_64
Error: Protected multilib versions: mesa-libEGL-10.6.0-0.devel.2.f80af89.fc23.i686 != mesa-libEGL-10.6.0-0.devel.450.970dc23.fc23.x86_64
Error: Protected multilib versions: mesa-libGL-10.6.0-0.devel.2.f80af89.fc23.i686 != mesa-libGL-10.6.0-0.devel.450.970dc23.fc23.x86_64
Error: Protected multilib versions: mesa-libgbm-10.6.0-0.devel.2.f80af89.fc23.i686 != mesa-libgbm-10.6.0-0.devel.450.970dc23.fc23.x86_64

dnf:
Error: package skype-4.3.0.37-2.R.i586 requires libQtGui.so.4, but none of the providers can be installed

Comment 1 Honza Silhan 2015-03-17 13:23:23 UTC
Thanks for the report. This belongs to better error messages family.

Comment 2 Jan Kurik 2015-07-15 14:24:00 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 23 development cycle.
Changing version to '23'.

(As we did not run this process for some time, it could affect also pre-Fedora 23 development
cycle bugs. We are very sorry. It will help us with cleanup during Fedora 23 End Of Life. Thank you.)

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora23

Comment 3 Honza Silhan 2015-07-21 09:58:24 UTC
Igor, please check if it's fixed for you in the upstream or in dnf-1.0.2 (not  released yet).

Comment 4 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2016-07-08 09:37:11 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 5 Fedora End Of Life 2016-11-24 11:34:17 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 23 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 23. It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time
this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora  'version'
of '23'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora 23 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora 
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.