Bug 1203411 - Add "+all" and "-TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256" to Console Cipher Preference for TLS
Summary: Add "+all" and "-TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256" to Console Cipher Preferenc...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Directory Server
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Directory Console
Version: 10.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: DS10.0
: ---
Assignee: Noriko Hosoi
QA Contact: Viktor Ashirov
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-03-18 18:40 UTC by Noriko Hosoi
Modified: 2020-09-13 21:21 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: idm-console-framework-1.1.10-1.el7dsrv 389-ds-console-1.2.11-1.el7dsrv
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Console Cipher Preference Dialog for TLS was obsolete. New cipher cettings +all and -TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 are added.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-06-12 01:04:20 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Consle cipher preference for TLS (3.13 KB, image/png)
2015-05-12 14:52 UTC, Viktor Ashirov
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github 389ds 389-ds-base issues 1461 0 None None None 2020-09-13 21:21:43 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2015:1094 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Red Hat Directory Server bug fix and enhancement update 2015-06-12 05:02:14 UTC

Description Noriko Hosoi 2015-03-18 18:40:47 UTC
This bug is created as a clone of upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48130

Comment 2 Viktor Ashirov 2015-05-12 14:52:37 UTC
Created attachment 1024625 [details]
Consle cipher preference for TLS

Build tested:
389-ds-console-1.2.12-1.el7dsrv.noarch
idm-console-framework-1.1.12-1.el7dsrv.noarch

Marking as VERIFIED.

Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2015-06-12 01:04:20 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015:1094


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.