RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1203643 - GPO access control looks for computer object in user's domain only
Summary: GPO access control looks for computer object in user's domain only
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: sssd
Version: 6.7
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Stephen Gallagher
QA Contact: Kaushik Banerjee
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1203642
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-03-19 10:20 UTC by Jakub Hrozek
Modified: 2020-05-04 10:46 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version: sssd-1.12.4-31.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
No documentation needed.
Clone Of: 1203642
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-07-22 06:43:42 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github SSSD sssd issues 3647 0 None None None 2020-05-04 10:46:51 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2015:1448 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE sssd bug fix and enhancement update 2015-07-20 18:43:53 UTC

Description Jakub Hrozek 2015-03-19 10:20:17 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1203642 +++

This bug is created as a clone of upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2606

The GPO access control code receives the user's domain as input and uses it to look up the computer object. That doesn't work if the user is from a subdomain, because we'd miss the computer object.

We need to look up the computer object in the domain we're enrolled with. We can use the GPO connection here, maybe, my initial testing shows that the attributes we're interested with are replicated to GC.

We also need to test with a computer enrolled with a child domain and login with user from parent domain to make sure the GPOs applied to the parent domain or OU are found correctly. Again, GC might be helpful here.

Comment 3 Dan Lavu 2015-06-11 13:55:38 UTC
This has been verified against sssd-ad-1.12.4-42.el6.x86_64 

ssh administrator@192.168.77.99
administrator@192.168.77.99's password: 
Last login: Thu Jun 11 08:55:37 2015 from daredevil.lab.runlevelone.lan
Could not chdir to home directory /home/example.com/administrator: No such file or directory
-bash-4.1$ exit
logout
Connection to 192.168.77.99 closed.

ssh administrator.com.77.99
administrator@192.168.77.99's password: 
Last login: Thu Jun 11 08:52:23 2015 from daredevil.lab.runlevelone.lan
Could not chdir to home directory /home/subdomain.example.com/administrator: No such file or directory

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2015-07-22 06:43:42 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1448.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.