Bug 1204314 - NRPE memory check doesn't factor cached memory
Summary: NRPE memory check doesn't factor cached memory
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: gluster-nagios-addons
Version: rhgs-3.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: RHGS 3.1.0
Assignee: Darshan
QA Contact: RamaKasturi
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1202842
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-03-20 23:43 UTC by Kevin Clevenger
Modified: 2019-08-15 04:24 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version: gluster-nagios-addons-0.2.1-1.el6rhs.x86_64.rpm
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Previously, the Memory utilization plugin was not deducting cached memory from used memory. This caused Nagios to alert for a low memory condition when none actually exists. With this fix, the used value is obtained by deducting cached value from it. Now, the Memory utilization plugin will return the correct value for used memory and hence there will be no false low memory alerts.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-07-29 05:27:37 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHEA-2015:1494 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Red Hat Gluster Storage Console 3.1 Enhancement and bug fixes 2015-07-29 09:24:02 UTC

Comment 1 Darshan 2015-03-23 09:24:54 UTC 
Kevin,

      We will have to deduct both cached and buffered space from the used space to get the *actual* used space right ?

Please provide your inputs on this.
Comment 3 Darshan 2015-03-24 06:58:31 UTC 
Fix Patch: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/9977/
Comment 6 Dusmant 2015-04-20 12:45:37 UTC 
Targeted for 3.1.0 release.
Comment 9 RamaKasturi 2015-05-29 08:52:34 UTC 
Verified and works fine with build gluster-nagios-addons-0.2.1-1.el6rhs.x86_64.rpm.

with this fix cached memory is also being deducted from the Used space to get the actual used space.
Comment 10 Divya 2015-07-26 05:13:34 UTC 
Darshan,

Could you review the edited doc text and sign-off.
Comment 11 Darshan 2015-07-27 05:15:03 UTC 
(In reply to Divya from comment #10)
> Darshan,
> 
> Could you review the edited doc text and sign-off.

Looks good.
Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2015-07-29 05:27:37 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2015-1494.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.