From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
Description of problem:
This may be more of an anaconda issue than initscripts, but I'm not sure.
Installed RHEL 3 QU3 on a 16-way x445 box, which has 4 Broadcom LAN
ports (2 per cabinet). Set two of them active in the installation,
eth0 to the 9.47. local subnet, and eth2 to 10.0.1.1 as a network test
Turns out that the default gateway bit was set on the eth2 interface
(to 10.0.1.254 -- which was not a router), despite having configured
the default gateway on eth0 to 9.47.
This is easy enough to fix, but would be confusing to the unwary
Is there some way to make anaconda and/or the network initscripts deal
with multiple interfaces better?
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install RHEL 3.0/QU03 on 16-way x445
2. Enable multiple interfaces during set-up.
3. Fail miserably, unless the last active interface is supposed to be
the default gateway.
Actual Results: All packets were sent to the twilight zone
(10.0.1.254), instead of the 9.47 subnet. This made the system appear
to have dead networking, despite having both eth0 and eth2 enabled,
both as far as neat and ifconfig were concerned.
Expected Results: eth0 should have been the default gateway.
AFAIK, this is expected behavior... unless you tweak the config, the
last machine gets the default route. There are various ways you can
change the config for this, of course.
Really? OK, how about a nice bright red message when someone
configures extra interfaces? Maybe: "The last interface will be the
Or whatever. Just pointing out something that might perplex the
unwary, now that more servers come with dual or quad LAN chips.