Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 1206198
Intel 9-series PCH chipset ACS quirks
Last modified: 2015-11-19 16:53:00 EST
Description of problem: Intel 9-series PCH chipsets lack native ACS support and we lack quirks for them. According to the datasheet, the device IDs for the PCH root ports on these chipsets are: 0x8c90, 0x8c92, 0x8c94, 0x8c96, 0x8c98, 0x8c9a, 0x8c9c, 0x8c9e The 9-series products include popular chipsets such as Z97 and H97. If Intel can confirm that these products provide isolation using the same programming model as used in bug 1037684, we can add quirks to expose the isolation of these root ports. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info:
Don, can we support this?
Don has confirmed ACS-equivalent isolation for these root ports using the same setup as the existing Intel PCH ACS quirk. Patch posted upstream: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.pci/41181 Re-assigning to myself for backport and post once accepted.
linux-next: commit dca230d162e27386d2ff24438ef56c645e55bf44 Author: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> Date: Fri May 1 13:20:13 2015 -0600 PCI: Add ACS quirks for Intel 9-series PCH root ports Intel confirms that 9-series chipset root ports provide ACS-equivalent isolation when configured via the existing Intel PCH ACS quirk setup. Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: Don Dugger <donald.d.dugger@intel.com>
Patch(es) available on kernel-3.10.0-267.el7
Confirmed ACS quirks added per description, also have run numerous kernel and userspace tests on these platforms with any issues documented as separate bugs.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2152.html