Bug 1206963 - rgw: object set attrs clobbers object removal bucket index update
Summary: rgw: object set attrs clobbers object removal bucket index update
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: RGW
Version: 1.2.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: rc
: 1.2.4
Assignee: Yehuda Sadeh
QA Contact: Warren
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1206749 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-03-30 00:37 UTC by Brad Hubbard
Modified: 2019-05-20 11:39 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-09-02 14:07:27 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Ceph Project Bug Tracker 11256 0 None None None Never
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2015:1703 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE ceph-radosgw and librbd package bug-fix update 2015-09-02 18:07:13 UTC

Description Brad Hubbard 2015-03-30 00:37:14 UTC 
Description of problem:

Revision 7538319d
Added by Yehuda Sadeh 2 days ago

rgw: generate new tag for object when setting object attrs

Fixes: #11256
Backport: firefly, hammer

Beforehand we were reusing the object's tag, which is problematic as
this tag is used for bucket index updates, and we might be clobbering a
racing update (like object removal).
Comment 4 Yehuda Sadeh 2015-06-22 21:32:08 UTC 
*** Bug 1206749 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Brad Hubbard 2015-07-14 20:43:45 UTC 
Making this public.
Comment 12 Warren 2015-08-26 05:08:42 UTC 
Works on 1.2.3.2 iso's for trusty and precise.
Comment 13 Warren 2015-09-01 02:14:36 UTC 
Works on 1.2.3.2 iso's for Centos 6.7
Comment 15 errata-xmlrpc 2015-09-02 14:07:27 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1703.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.