Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Feature:
Do not check pcsd status in pcs status command unless --full option is there. If --full option is there, parallelize pcsd status check.
Reason:
Make it faster to run pcs status, when some nodes are down.
Result:
Command pcs status runs faster, when some nodes are down.
DescriptionJaroslav Kortus
2015-03-30 20:55:42 UTC
Description of problem:
Immediately after a node goes down, the next pcs status will take very long to complete.
# pcs status
Cluster name: STSRHTS19418
Last updated: Mon Mar 30 22:51:08 2015
Last change: Mon Mar 30 22:51:05 2015
Stack: corosync
Current DC: virt-062 (1) - partition with quorum
Version: 1.1.12-a14efad
3 Nodes configured
3 Resources configured
Online: [ virt-062 virt-063 virt-064 ]
Full list of resources:
fence-virt-062 (stonith:fence_xvm): Started virt-062
fence-virt-063 (stonith:fence_xvm): Started virt-063
fence-virt-064 (stonith:fence_xvm): Started virt-064
PCSD Status:
virt-062: Online
virt-063: Online
virt-064: Online
Daemon Status:
corosync: active/disabled
pacemaker: active/disabled
pcsd: active/enabled
[root@virt-062 ~]# time pcs status
Cluster name: STSRHTS19418
Last updated: Mon Mar 30 22:51:20 2015
Last change: Mon Mar 30 22:51:05 2015
Stack: corosync
Current DC: virt-062 (1) - partition with quorum
Version: 1.1.12-a14efad
3 Nodes configured
3 Resources configured
Online: [ virt-062 virt-063 virt-064 ]
Full list of resources:
fence-virt-062 (stonith:fence_xvm): Started virt-062
fence-virt-063 (stonith:fence_xvm): Started virt-063
fence-virt-064 (stonith:fence_xvm): Started virt-064
PCSD Status:
virt-062: Online
virt-063: Online
virt-064: Offline
Daemon Status:
corosync: active/disabled
pacemaker: active/disabled
pcsd: active/enabled
real 0m33.207s
user 0m0.228s
sys 0m0.069s
I would like to have the timeout in reasonable values (seconds?). I would not mind if it was removed completely and moved to --full.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pcs-0.9.137-13.el7.x86_64
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. halt -fin one node
2. immediately issue pcs status on any remaining node
3.
Actual results:
command freezes for a while (30s-1min) on pcsd status display
Expected results:
pcsd checks not delaying the output (ideally so that you can do watch -n1 pcs status and get updates every second)
Additional info:
Hi Chris, thanks for the quick reaction!
I'd happy with --wait=0 for some kind of disabling the functionality completely (and move it to --full).
I think that from the pure clustering perspective, the cluster operations are not affected at all by in which state the pcsd currently is.
The scope of operations requiring (especially remote) pcsd is limited, correct? Ideally I would just add a check to these operations and remove it from pcs status completely (and this way get it on-par with pcs status xml).
What do you think? Is it really that vital to have that information there?
# time pcs status &> /dev/null; time pcs status xml &>/dev/null
real 0m1.411s
user 0m0.222s
sys 0m0.087s
real 0m0.271s
user 0m0.210s
sys 0m0.052s
I like the 0.2s version much better :). Also the timeout (if introduced) should be for all checks in total (ideally done in parallel as bug 1188659 suggests).
I'm also wondering if completely removing the pcsd checks from the default pcsd status would make sense as well. And only do them when doing 'pcs status --full' or something similar. But either way, we will want to default timeouts to 5 seconds (and allow changing with --wait).
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.
For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.
If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2596.html