Bug 1208129 - 5.4 kickstart file points to RHEL 6.5
Summary: 5.4 kickstart file points to RHEL 6.5
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Build
Version: 5.4.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: GA
: 5.4.0
Assignee: John Prause
QA Contact: Milan Falešník
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-04-01 13:11 UTC by John Prause
Modified: 2015-06-16 12:56 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-06-16 12:56:37 UTC
Category: ---
Cloudforms Team: ---
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2015:1100 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE CFME 5.4.0 bug fixes, and enhancement update 2015-06-16 16:28:42 UTC

Description John Prause 2015-04-01 13:11:16 UTC 
On master branch, the cfme_productization/manageiq/build/productization/kickstarts/base.ks.erb references RHEL 6.5
If we're using RHEL 6.6 on the 5.3.z builds, shouldn't the 5.4 kickstart files also use RHEL 6.6 or better?

Excerpt of the base.ks.erb:


#version=DEVEL
install
url --url=http://download.devel.redhat.com/released/RHEL-6/6.5/Server/x86_64/os/

# Update for openssl fix: https://errata.devel.redhat.com/advisory/16560
repo --name=z-stream --baseurl=http://download.eng.bos.redhat.com/devel/cfme/repos/rhel-6.5.z-x86_64-latest-pkgs/



As a point of reference, the no-cfme-vsphere.ks references the RHEL 6.6 repo.
Comment 1 John Prause 2015-04-01 17:05:05 UTC 
Submitted PR with fixes for this issue.
Comment 2 John Prause 2015-04-01 17:21:59 UTC 
Changes have been merged.
Comment 4 John Prause 2015-04-29 16:07:20 UTC 
Yes,..that looks good.
Comment 6 Milan Falešník 2015-05-04 08:14:30 UTC 
Verified in 5.4.0.0.24.20150427192818_1fd9e49
Comment 7 John Prause 2015-05-08 16:08:19 UTC 
Forgot to clear the needinfo flag.
I answered Milan's question above.
Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2015-06-16 12:56:37 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1100.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.