Spec URL: http://ojuba.org/test/elokab.spec SRPM URL: http://ojuba.org/test/elokab-0.3-7.oj35.src.rpm Description: Very Light Qt Desktop Environment. Fedora Account System Username: moceap
Hi, is this desktop also available for other countries with individual localization files? Why do you add yourself inside the source code as an author? IMHO packager does not mean upstream developer. Is this allowed by the upstream project members and please pay attention and care to the respective copyright and license (GPLv3+)? I am not able to read the upstream documentation cause the font is not in my language knowledge. As far as I can see, this software is still in beta state. Why do you think it should be part of (stable) Fedora? Rawhide would not mean a problem but Fedora 22 what is currently in "code freeze". Fedora 21 should not get such a piece of software collection cause it is kept to be -really- stable. Short summary: I do not think this software is in a good state for now to get successfully packaged. Though, rawhide could be the only option. Sorry to have to tell that.
Rawhide isn't a dumping ground for half-baked software, it is a staging area for the next stable release. If this truly isn't ready for use, use a COPR.
No , I dont Add myself to authors .. Just fix spelling by last packager. It built on COPR https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/moceap/Elokab/build/84380/ So I see it ready for Fedora.
I think el okab desktop environment and a stable version, indepandante other, unwanted envirenement qt Biblioteque in addition it is tested and it was really flexible for the translation that's what's really easy it is already translated in english in françcais and Arabic Here the developer site: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:abouzakaria/elokab in site sourceforge.net: https://sourceforge.net/projects/elokab/ emballeur sur launchpad.net: https://launchpad.net/elokab-desktop-environment So I see it ready for Fedora.
This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag. You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group. Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned and will be closed. Thank you for your patience.
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.