Bug 1208821 - Review Request: rubygem-gtksourceview3 - Ruby binding of gtksourceview-3.x
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gtksourceview3 - Ruby binding of gtksourceview-3.x
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: František Dvořák
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-04-03 10:10 UTC by Mamoru TASAKA
Modified: 2015-04-22 00:43 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-04-22 00:43:06 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
valtri: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Mamoru TASAKA 2015-04-03 10:10:24 UTC
Spec URL: https://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/ruby-gnome2-suite/rubygem-gtksourceview3.spec
SRPM URL: https://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/ruby-gnome2-suite/rubygem-gtksourceview3-2.2.4-1.fc.src.rpm
Description: 
Ruby/GtkSourceView3 is a Ruby binding of gtksourceview-3.x.

Fedora Account System Username: mtasaka

Comment 1 František Dvořák 2015-04-06 20:54:16 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated


===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
     Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
     attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
     "LGPL (v2.1 or later)", "Unknown or generated".
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Ruby:
[x]: Platform dependent files must all go under %{gem_extdir_mri}, platform
     independent under %{gem_dir}.
[x]: Gem package must not define a non-gem subpackage
[x]: Macro %{gem_extdir} is deprecated.
[x]: Gem package is named rubygem-%{gem_name}
[x]: Package contains BuildRequires: rubygems-devel.
[x]: Gem package must define %{gem_name} macro.
[x]: Package does not contain Requires: ruby(abi).

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages.
     Note: Package contains font files
     Note: In generated docs
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Package functions as described.
     OK: xvfb-run ruby -e 'require "gtksourceview3"'
     OK: samples
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

Ruby:
[x]: Specfile should use macros from rubygem-devel package.
[x]: Gem package should exclude cached Gem.
[x]: Gem should use %gem_install macro.
[x]: Test suite should not be run by rake.
[x]: Test suite of the library should be run.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is
     arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: rubygem-gtksourceview3-2.2.4-1.fc22.x86_64.rpm
          rubygem-gtksourceview3-doc-2.2.4-1.fc22.noarch.rpm
          rubygem-gtksourceview3-2.2.4-1.fc22.src.rpm
rubygem-gtksourceview3.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) gtksourceview -> outsource
rubygem-gtksourceview3.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gtksourceview -> outsource
rubygem-gtksourceview3.x86_64: W: no-documentation
rubygem-gtksourceview3.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/lib64/gems/ruby/gtksourceview3-2.2.4/gem.build_complete
rubygem-gtksourceview3.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) gtksourceview -> outsource
rubygem-gtksourceview3.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gtksourceview -> outsource
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
Cannot parse rpmlint output:


Requires
--------
rubygem-gtksourceview3-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    rubygem-gtksourceview3

rubygem-gtksourceview3 (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libcairo-gobject.so.2()(64bit)
    libcairo.so.2()(64bit)
    libcrypt.so.1()(64bit)
    libdl.so.2()(64bit)
    libgdk-3.so.0()(64bit)
    libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgtk-3.so.0()(64bit)
    libgtksourceview-3.0.so.1()(64bit)
    libm.so.6()(64bit)
    libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
    libruby.so.2.2()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)
    ruby(rubygems)
    rubygem(gtk3)



Provides
--------
rubygem-gtksourceview3-doc:
    rubygem-gtksourceview3-doc

rubygem-gtksourceview3:
    rubygem(gtksourceview3)
    rubygem-gtksourceview3
    rubygem-gtksourceview3(x86-64)



Unversioned so-files
--------------------
rubygem-gtksourceview3: /usr/lib64/gems/ruby/gtksourceview3-2.2.4/gtksourceview3.so

Source checksums
----------------
https://rubygems.org/gems/gtksourceview3-2.2.4.gem :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : eb381151217ce92ace80e2e0e5b69461a6d005f92f97d4171a9845e9e1825edf
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : eb381151217ce92ace80e2e0e5b69461a6d005f92f97d4171a9845e9e1825edf


Generated by fedora-review 0.5.2 (63c24cb) last change: 2014-07-14
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-22-x86_64 -b 1208821
Buildroot used: fedora-22-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Ruby, Shell-api, C/C++
Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG

=====

Good work. :-) Package APPROVED!

Comment 2 Mamoru TASAKA 2015-04-07 09:15:54 UTC
Thank you!

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name:  rubygem-gtksourceview3
Short Description: Ruby binding of gtksourceview-3.x
Upstream URL: http://ruby-gnome2.sourceforge.jp/
Owners: mtasaka
Branches: f22 f21
InitialCC:

Comment 3 Gwyn Ciesla 2015-04-07 13:35:11 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 4 Mamoru TASAKA 2015-04-22 00:43:06 UTC
Oh, this is already imported into Fedora, closing.

Thank you for review and git procedure.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.