Bug 1210715 - migration/rdma: 7.1->7.2: RDMA ERROR: ram blocks mismatch #3!
Summary: migration/rdma: 7.1->7.2: RDMA ERROR: ram blocks mismatch #3!
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: qemu-kvm-rhev
Version: 7.2
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
urgent
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Dr. David Alan Gilbert
QA Contact: Virtualization Bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1174920 1242032 1248382
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-04-10 12:23 UTC by Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Modified: 2015-12-04 16:35 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: qemu-kvm-rhev-2.3.0-13.el7
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1242032 1248382 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-12-04 16:35:58 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
xml for broken vm (3.71 KB, text/html)
2015-04-10 12:23 UTC, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2015:2546 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE qemu-kvm-rhev bug fix and enhancement update 2015-12-04 21:11:56 UTC

Description Dr. David Alan Gilbert 2015-04-10 12:23:23 UTC
Created attachment 1013118 [details]
xml for broken vm

Description of problem:
This VM migrates fine usign TCP but with RDMA it fails

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

source: qemu-kvm-rhev-2.1.2-23.el7_1.1.x86_64
dest: qemu-kvm-rhev-2.3.0-0.el7.dgilbert20150410a.x86_64

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. See xml attached; 7.1 machine type vm started on 7.1
2. migrate to 7.2 using RDMA - virsh migrate --live --migrateuri rdma://ibpair f20-414 qemu+ssh://ibpair/system --listen-address 192.168.99.13


Actual results:
Migration fails, error seen in source logs:
RDMA ERROR: ram blocks mismatch #3! Your QEMU command line parameters are probably not identical on both the source and destination.


Expected results:
A working migration

Additional info:

Comment 2 Dr. David Alan Gilbert 2015-04-10 14:33:42 UTC
    hmm, the RDMA code seems to be keying off the 'offset' which I think is the offset in RAMBlock address space - that's not in any way intended to stay the same across versions
'mismatch #3' is when qemu_rdma_registration_stop failed to find a matching RAMBlock.

Comment 3 Dr. David Alan Gilbert 2015-04-17 11:04:02 UTC
Just confirmed this also affects 7.1 by itself with hotplug, hotplug a device on the source, but have it on the command line on the destination and it fails in a similar way.

Comment 8 Miroslav Rezanina 2015-07-24 11:08:07 UTC
Fix included in qemu-kvm-rhev-2.3.0-13.el7

Comment 11 Shaolong Hu 2015-07-31 07:18:13 UTC
source host:
qemu-kvm-1.5.3-60.el7.x86_64


Reproduced with qemu-kvm-rhev-2.3.0-8.el7.x86_64 on target host:


(qemu) migrate -d x-rdma:192.168.0.21:6666
source_resolve_host RDMA Device opened: kernel name mlx4_0 uverbs device name uverbs0, infiniband_verbs class device path /sys/class/infiniband_verbs/uverbs0, infiniband class device path /sys/class/infiniband/mlx4_0, transport: (1) Infiniband
(qemu) 
(qemu) 
(qemu) 
(qemu) 
(qemu) info migrateRDMA ERROR: ram blocks mismatch #1! Your QEMU command line parameters are probably not identical on both the source and destination.


Verify failed with qemu-kvm-rhev-2.3.0-13.el7.x86_64 on target host:

(qemu) migrate -d x-rdma:192.168.0.21:6666
source_resolve_host RDMA Device opened: kernel name mlx4_0 uverbs device name uverbs0, infiniband_verbs class device path /sys/class/infiniband_verbs/uverbs0, infiniband class device path /sys/class/infiniband/mlx4_0, transport: (1) Infiniband
(qemu) RDMA ERROR: ram blocks mismatch #1! Your QEMU command line parameters are probably not identical on both the source and destination.


David, could you have a look?

Comment 12 Shaolong Hu 2015-07-31 09:23:05 UTC
Retest with qemu-kvm-rhev-2.1.2-23.el7_1.6.x86_64 on source host, result are the same.

Comment 17 errata-xmlrpc 2015-12-04 16:35:58 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2546.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.