Bug 1211762
| Summary: | [RFE] OVF_STORE disks should be filtered out in the views in Admin Portal | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [oVirt] ovirt-engine | Reporter: | Marina Kalinin <mkalinin> | ||||
| Component: | RFEs | Assignee: | Tal Nisan <tnisan> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Raz Tamir <ratamir> | ||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||
| Version: | 3.5.0 | CC: | amureini, bugs, ebenahar, lpeer, lsurette, rbalakri, srevivo, tnisan, ykaul, ylavi | ||||
| Target Milestone: | ovirt-4.2.0 | Keywords: | FutureFeature | ||||
| Target Release: | --- | Flags: | amureini:
ovirt-4.2?
gklein: testing_plan_complete- rule-engine: planning_ack? rule-engine: devel_ack+ rule-engine: testing_ack+ |
||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2017-12-20 11:33:44 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | Storage | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 902971 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Marina Kalinin
2015-04-14 20:06:01 UTC
Not sure it's right to filter them out completely, they are still images existing in the storage domain and the admin should probably know about their existence and maybe also for backup issues. We can maybe filter it out on their own rubric such as the filtering in All disks/Images/LUNs, we can add OVF disks there Allon, what do you think? seems like a "duplicate" of bug 1131508 (this one is RHEV, bug 1131508 is oVirt). (In reply to Tal Nisan from comment #1) > Not sure it's right to filter them out completely, they are still images > existing in the storage domain and the admin should probably know about > their existence and maybe also for backup issues. > We can maybe filter it out on their own rubric such as the filtering in All > disks/Images/LUNs, we can add OVF disks there > Allon, what do you think? The admin should be able to see these, although I agree they probably don't fit the default view. Looking forward, we should have two types of filters: 1. The disk TYPE - image, direct lun or cinder 2. The disk FUNCTION - data (most of our disks), ovf_store, memory_volume (Arik Hadas is working on it). The default filtering should be all storage types for data only. *** Bug 1131508 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** In 4.2, a new radio selection was added for Content Type. The default display is "all" (in order to keep backwards compatibility), but you can select specific types, such as data (see attached screenshot) Created attachment 1342684 [details]
Content Type radio selection
Hi, I need more information about the expected results (from comment #0): "... from the Attach Dialogue for VM's Add Disk feature, since those disks cannot be attached to VM anyway." --> This is not the actual results "On the disks tab, those disk can be showed, but not together with other regular images. " --> This is not the actual results The actual results should be that the disks in the main disks tab can be filtered according to their content type, there should also be an option to show all the disks as well. As for the attach option, a separate bug can be opened for that as not only OVF disks should be filtered but any disk that is not a DATA disk Thanks Tal. Opened https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507426 This bug verified on ovirt-engine-4.2.0-0.0.master.20171027213842.gitded437c.el7.centos This bugzilla is included in oVirt 4.2.0 release, published on Dec 20th 2017. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in oVirt 4.2.0 release, published on Dec 20th 2017, it has been closed with a resolution of CURRENT RELEASE. If the solution does not work for you, please open a new bug report. |