Bug 1214007 - rgw: civetweb number of threads is limited
Summary: rgw: civetweb number of threads is limited
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: RGW
Version: 1.3.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: 1.3.0
Assignee: Yehuda Sadeh
QA Contact: Harish NV Rao
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-04-21 18:08 UTC by Yehuda Sadeh
Modified: 2022-02-21 18:33 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ceph-0.94.1-7.el7cp
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-06-24 15:52:16 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Ceph Project Bug Tracker 10243 0 None None None Never
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCEPH-3472 0 None None None 2022-02-21 18:33:32 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2015:1183 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Ceph bug fix and enhancement update 2015-06-24 19:49:46 UTC

Description Yehuda Sadeh 2015-04-21 18:08:47 UTC 
Description of problem:

Civetweb has 1024 max number of threads.


How reproducible:
always


Steps to Reproduce:
1. set "rgw thread pool size" to a number higher than 1024
2. configure civetweb frontend

Actual results:

rgw does not handle requests properly

Expected results:

rgw should handle requests properly
Comment 1 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2015-04-24 23:13:13 UTC 
The patch we will want to incorporate downstream for this is https://github.com/ceph/civetweb/commit/8a07012185851b8e8be180391866b5995c10ee93
Comment 4 shilpa 2015-06-15 11:19:37 UTC 
Verified on ceph-0.94.1-11. With the machines I have, the max number of threads I can set is 32k. Tried with different numbers > 1024. RGW operations work fine.
Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2015-06-24 15:52:16 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015:1183
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.