Bug 1214073 - rgw: shouldn't need to disable rgw_socket_path if frontend is configured
Summary: rgw: shouldn't need to disable rgw_socket_path if frontend is configured
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: RGW
Version: 1.3.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: 1.3.0
Assignee: Yehuda Sadeh
QA Contact: Harish NV Rao
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1214066
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-04-21 21:14 UTC by Yehuda Sadeh
Modified: 2022-02-21 18:36 UTC (History)
12 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ceph-0.94.1-7.el7cp
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1214066
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-06-24 15:52:19 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Ceph Project Bug Tracker 11160 0 None None None Never
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCEPH-3490 0 None None None 2022-02-21 18:36:14 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2015:1183 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Ceph bug fix and enhancement update 2015-06-24 19:49:46 UTC

Description Yehuda Sadeh 2015-04-21 21:14:21 UTC 
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1214066 +++

Description of problem:

In order to specify a tcp frontend, the rgw_socket_path configurable needs to be set to an empty string. This shouldn't be required.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
always


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Configure rgw fastcgi frontend with tcp.

Actual results:
rgw doesn't listen to the configured tcp socket

Expected results:
rgw listens to the configured tcp socket

Additional info:
Fixed upstream
Comment 3 shilpa 2015-06-15 09:25:14 UTC 
Verified in ceph-0.94.1-11.el7cp.x86_64
Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2015-06-24 15:52:19 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015:1183
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.