Bug 1218272

Description of problem:

Has anyone looked at the performance of libcurl based tools using RHEL7.0 and 7.1 when fetching files using FTP.

I started investigating this after finding that RHEL7 installs were taking massively longer than RHEL5 or 6 ones. Further investigate showed that the unexpected difference went away when switching to using HTTP instead of FTP to talk to the file server.

I then repeated my tests using yum on an installed system. Installing the default base 7.1 configuration and then loading the "Server with GUI" environment on top with yum with FTP results in the download of 890 RPMs taking 7m40s whereas using HTTP the same download from the same server is completed in 7s, a speed difference of over 65times.

I believe that yum uses urlgrabber (python-urlgrabber.noarch 3.10-6.el7) which in turn uses pycurl (python-pycurl.x86_64 7.19.0-17.el7) which uses libcurl (libcurl.x86_64 7.29.0-19.el7).
So next I tried comparing the behaviour of curl using FTP and HTTP and comparing these with wget and also with RHEL6.4.

I used a simple shell loop to download a small (less than 1K file) 10 times. I originally planned to do it 1000 times, but this proved to take far too long.

                real            usr           sys
RHEL 7.1
curl    FTP     0m11.610s       0m0.026s      0m0.041s
        HTTP    0m1.551s        0m0.017s      0m0.039s


wget    FTP     0m0.091s        0m0.011s      0m0.040s
        HTTP    0m0.049s        0m0.014s      0m0.031s

RHEL6.4
curl    FTP     0m0.099s        0m0.016s      0m0.031s
        HTTP    0m0.096s        0m0.013s      0m0.042s

wget    FTP     0m0.087s        0m0.007s      0m0.036s
        HTTP    0m0.048s        0m0.008s      0m0.028s


So comparing curl on RHEL7.1 between FTP and HTTP there is a speed difference of about 7.5. Comparing RHEL7.1 curl and wget for FTP there is a speed difference of 127 times and comparing curl using FTP between RHEL7.1 and 6.4 I see a speed difference of 117 times.

All of these measurements where made using HP ProLiant bl460c Gen8 blades using a Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM57810 running at 10Gb talking to a fileserver running RHEL6.4 with vsftpd and Apache. I have also experienced the same problems with a variety of other HP ProLiant servers using a number of different network cards.

This issue significantly impacts the install speed of RHEL7 when using FTP. I run training classes and for years have been used to scripting rebuilds of whole classrooms taking less than 10 minutes. With RHEL7 I was seeing install times of about 1 hour. 


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
The install SW for both RHEL7.0 and 7.1
yum-3.4.3-125.el7.noarch
python-urlgrabber.noarch 3.10-6.el7
python-pycurl.x86_64 7.19.0-17.el7
curl-7.29.0-19.el7.x86_64


How reproducible:
totally.


Steps to Reproduce:
1. write a script like

#!/bin/sh

typeset -i n=0

while ((n<10))
do
        curl -s ftp://192.168.73.24/pub/vm1 > /dev/null
#       curl -s http://192.168.73.24/ftp/pub/vm1 > /dev/null
#       wget --quiet ftp://192.168.73.24/pub/vm1
#       wget --quiet http://192.168.73.24/ftp/pub/vm1 > /dev/null
        let n=n+1
        echo $n
done

You'll obviously need to use your own file server and filename.

2. time the script
3. try the different download options.

Actual results:

RHEL 7.1
curl    FTP     0m11.610s       0m0.026s      0m0.041s
        HTTP    0m1.551s        0m0.017s      0m0.039s


wget    FTP     0m0.091s        0m0.011s      0m0.040s
        HTTP    0m0.049s        0m0.014s      0m0.031s


Expected results:

No significant difference between curl and wget, a small difference between FTP and HTTP, like with the wget example. FTP needs to establish a second network connection so is likely to be a little slower on this test.

Additional info:

I think this is likely to be in libcurl rather than just python-pycurl, but this tool wouldn't let me put libcurl in the component field.