Hide Forgot
The check-mk-agent package makes a lot of agent plugins available in /usr/share/check-mk-agent/plugins In the same directory, there's a README file stating "Please only install the plugins that you really need." See also http://git.mathias-kettner.de/git/?p=check_mk.git;a=blob;f=agents/plugins/README;h=cd89b2c47ae2c03f05a50a050715a297518f2b8f;hb=refs/heads/master The result of this is that false UNKNOWN or warning/error states may show up (such as from the "dnsclient" plugin which may generate false alerts if the host is running in a DMZ with limited DNS resolving capabilities). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): check-mk-agent-1.2.6p1-2.el7 I suggest that the /usr/share/check-mk-agent/plugins be kept as an empty directory. And that the plugins be put in another directory, such as /usr/share/check-mk-agent/optional-plugins; users may then use symlinks to populate /usr/share/check-mk-agent/plugins to reflect the actual needs.
check-mk-1.2.6p2-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/check-mk-1.2.6p2-1.fc20
check-mk-1.2.6p2-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/check-mk-1.2.6p2-1.el7
check-mk-1.2.6p2-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/check-mk-1.2.6p2-1.fc22
check-mk-1.2.6p2-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/check-mk-1.2.6p2-1.el5
check-mk-1.2.6p2-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/check-mk-1.2.6p2-1.fc21
check-mk-1.2.6p2-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/check-mk-1.2.6p2-1.el6
check-mk-1.2.6p3-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/check-mk-1.2.6p3-1.el7
check-mk-1.2.6p3-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/check-mk-1.2.6p3-1.fc21
check-mk-1.2.6p3-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/check-mk-1.2.6p3-1.fc22
check-mk-1.2.6p3-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/check-mk-1.2.6p3-1.el6
check-mk-1.2.6p3-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/check-mk-1.2.6p3-1.fc20
check-mk-1.2.6p3-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/check-mk-1.2.6p3-1.el5
check-mk-1.2.6p3-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
check-mk-1.2.6p3-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
check-mk-1.2.6p3-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Tried installing the EPEL 7 targeted agent (check-mk-agent-1.2.6p3-1.el7.x86_64.rpm), but didn't complete it, as it was about to install a host of strange dependencies: httpd, httpd-tools, libzip, php, php-cli, php-common
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218799 is related, the php package seems to take in httpd and httpd-tools as well. The solution it's either to remove the php dependency from the agent all together (and that means the plugins using php won't be able to run without prior installation of the missing dependency) or to keep it and find out why php depends on httpd and httpd-devel packages to function correctly.
In my opinion, it's way beyond reason to include httpd and httpd devel when one only asks for the check_mk agent. So yes, I think that the php dependency should be removed from the agent sub-package. (By the way: Meanwhile, version 1.2.6p5 of check_mk has been released.)
check-mk-1.2.6p5-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/check-mk-1.2.6p5-1.el5
check-mk-1.2.6p5-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/check-mk-1.2.6p5-1.fc22
check-mk-1.2.6p5-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/check-mk-1.2.6p5-1.el6
check-mk-1.2.6p5-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/check-mk-1.2.6p5-1.fc20
check-mk-1.2.6p5-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/check-mk-1.2.6p5-1.fc21
check-mk-1.2.6p5-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/check-mk-1.2.6p5-1.el7
check-mk-agent-1.2.6p5-1.el7.x86_64.rpm is perfect on the RHEL 7.1 installation I tried it on, thanks.
Tried closing the bug, but maybe it shouldn't be me closing it?
The package is still not in EPEL. Sorry if it's my fault due to having closed this bug. Trying to re-open it.
check-mk-1.2.6p5-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
check-mk-1.2.6p5-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
check-mk-1.2.6p5-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
check-mk-1.2.6p5-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
check-mk-1.2.6p5-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
check-mk-1.2.6p5-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.