Description of problem: Installed F22 Final TC3 Workstation x86_64 live (to a KVM), ran Evo, completed the first-time wizard (using my own server and account, all fairly normal values). Crashed after the wizard completed, at the point I'd expect to be prompted for the passwords. Somehow crashed the Shell, too. Version-Release number of selected component: evolution-3.16.1-1.fc22 Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.5.1 backtrace_rating: 4 cmdline: evolution crash_function: WebCore::FrameView::removeChild executable: /usr/bin/evolution global_pid: 5233 kernel: 4.0.1-300.fc22.x86_64 runlevel: N 5 type: CCpp uid: 1000 Truncated backtrace: Thread no. 1 (10 frames) #0 WebCore::FrameView::removeChild at Source/WebCore/page/FrameView.cpp:3995 #1 WebCore::ScrollView::setHasVerticalScrollbar at Source/WebCore/platform/ScrollView.cpp:125 #2 WebCore::ScrollView::updateScrollbars at Source/WebCore/platform/ScrollView.cpp:609 #3 WebCore::ScrollView::setFrameRect at Source/WebCore/platform/ScrollView.cpp:956 #4 WebCore::FrameView::setFrameRect at Source/WebCore/page/FrameView.cpp:434 #5 resizeWebViewFromAllocation at Source/WebCore/platform/Widget.h:123 #6 webkit_web_view_size_allocate at Source/WebKit/gtk/webkit/webkitwebview.cpp:907 #7 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOXEDv at gmarshal.c:1950 #8 _g_closure_invoke_va at gclosure.c:831 #11 gtk_widget_size_allocate_with_baseline at gtkwidget.c:6093
Created attachment 1023624 [details] File: backtrace
Created attachment 1023625 [details] File: cgroup
Created attachment 1023626 [details] File: core_backtrace
Created attachment 1023627 [details] File: dso_list
Created attachment 1023628 [details] File: environ
Created attachment 1023629 [details] File: limits
Created attachment 1023630 [details] File: maps
Created attachment 1023631 [details] File: mountinfo
Created attachment 1023632 [details] File: namespaces
Created attachment 1023633 [details] File: open_fds
Created attachment 1023634 [details] File: proc_pid_status
Created attachment 1023635 [details] File: var_log_messages
Proposing as a Final blocker as a violation of "All applications that can be launched using the standard graphical mechanism of a release-blocking desktop after a default installation of that desktop must start successfully and withstand a basic functionality test." - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Final_Release_Criteria#Default_application_functionality . This comes under 'basic functionality', for me. Have to check that it's reproducible, though.
Shell crash is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219988 .
Discussed at the 2015-05-11 blocker review meeting[0] where it was agreed to await further information before voting. AGREED: 1219986 - punt (delay decision) - so far we have only one data point here, need to see if it can be reproduced (adamw, 17:46:40) [0]: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2015-05-11/
Similar upstream (evolution) bug report: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=740710 I didn't find anything recent (nor opened) in the WebKit's bugzilla for this call.
Reported as https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144903
*** Bug 1180784 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
I just attempted to reproduce this with evolution-3.16.2.1-1.fc22.x86_64 and webkitgtk3-2.4.8-5.fc22.x86_64 and could not. Adding a new imap+ account succeeded as expected. Without additional reports of failure, I'm inclined to vote -1 blocker.
When you say you "attempted to reproduce" by "Adding a new imap+ account", do you just mean you added an existing account to an already-used Evo instance? Because that isn't what I was doing, I was running the first-time setup wizard on a fresh install.
(In reply to Adam Williamson from comment #20) > When you say you "attempted to reproduce" by "Adding a new imap+ account", > do you just mean you added an existing account to an already-used Evo > instance? Because that isn't what I was doing, I was running the first-time > setup wizard on a fresh install. I just attempted to do the same on a fresh VM with the first-time setup wizard. No crash detected. (This is on an x86_64 KVM virtual machine) with Final TC3.
Indeed, I couldn't reproduce this on a second attempt; either there's some random element to it or possibly it has something to do with other apps I'd run between the install and the Evo run...
Discussed at the 2015-05-14 blocker review meeting.[1] Voted as RejectedBlocker - this does not appear to be reproducible at present, adam will re-propose if he finds a clear reproducer [1] http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2015-05-14
Fedora 22 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-07-19. Fedora 22 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
*** Bug 1701709 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***