Bug 122004 – proxy installer: simple commandline installation (of RPMs) utility. Part of phase 2 of installer rewrite.

Bug 122004 - proxy installer: simple commandline installation (of RPMs) utility. Part of phase 2 of installer rewrite.

Summary:	proxy installer: simple commandline installation (of RPMs) utility. Part of p...

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 468874

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Satellite 5
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	Installer (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	low Severity low
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Miroslav Suchý
QA Contact:	Jeff Browning
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:	456999
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2004-04-29 13:22 EDT by Todd Warner
Modified:	2009-08-10 10:02 EDT (History)
CC List:	3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-02-19 03:15:26 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Todd Warner 2004-04-29 13:22:14 EDT

As part of phase 2 of RHN Proxy installer rewrite, we need to have an easy way
to install RPMs without any configuration.

Wrap SSL tool as well? Or should that be part of the webUI configuration tool.

Comment 1 Todd Warner 2004-04-29 13:22:49 EDT

Maybe do this via provisioning?

Comment 2 Miroslav Suchý 2009-02-18 05:12:14 EST

Brandon,
why did you set sat-5.3.0+ ?
Do you understand it? I read it twice and still do not know what the description means.

"easy way to install RPMs without any configuration" 
???

I'm tempting to close it as NOTABUG.

Comment 3 Brandon Perkins 2009-02-18 23:30:15 EST

This is a  needinfo? (taw).  My interpretation (which could be incorrect), is that he is basically asking for a CLI Proxy Installer.  Which we have now.  If that is not the case, then we need to have PM review it, which ironically is taw.

Comment 4 Miroslav Suchý 2009-02-19 03:15:26 EST

OK. Marking as DUPLICATE.
If you feel this is different issue, please reopen this bug.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 468874 ***

Comment 6 Tomas Lestach 2009-08-10 10:02:24 EDT

Stage validation -> ClosedValid

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.