RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1220480 - sudo option mail_no_user doesn't work with sssd provider
Summary: sudo option mail_no_user doesn't work with sssd provider
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: sudo
Version: 6.6
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Radovan Sroka
QA Contact: Dalibor Pospíšil
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-05-11 15:41 UTC by Dalibor Pospíšil
Modified: 2016-05-10 21:43 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version: sudo-1.8.6p3-21.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1142122
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-05-10 21:43:28 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
erratum patch (527 bytes, patch)
2015-12-15 16:39 UTC, Radovan Sroka
no flags Details | Diff


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2016:0853 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE sudo bug fix and enhancement update 2016-05-10 22:43:44 UTC

Description Dalibor Pospíšil 2015-05-11 15:41:40 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1142122 +++

The same problem in rhel 6, tested with sudo-1.8.6p3-12.el6
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1140980 +++

Description of problem:
sudo option mail_no_user doesn't work with sssd provider

I have following sudoers entries in ldap:
dn: cn=defaults,ou=Sudoers,dc=my-domain,dc=com
objectClass: top
objectClass: sudoRole
sudoOption: !requiretty
sudoOption: !authenticate
sudoOption: mailto=emailto
sudoOption: mail_no_user
cn: defaults

dn: cn=rule1,ou=Sudoers,dc=my-domain,dc=com
objectClass: top
objectClass: sudoRole
cn: rule1
sudoUser: userallowed
sudoHost: ALL
sudoCommand: ALL

# try sudo with user which isn't in sudoers
[test]su - usernotallowed -c 'sudo true'
su: warning: cannot change directory to /home/usernotallowed: No such file or directory
usernotallowed is not allowed to run sudo on rhel7.  This incident will be reported.

/var/log/maillog doesn't contain any mail after it.

Additional info:
debug logs will be attached later

Comment 2 Daniel Kopeček 2015-11-11 10:02:37 UTC
(In reply to Dalibor Pospíšil from comment #0)
> Additional info:
> debug logs will be attached later

Please provide the debug logs.

Comment 3 Radovan Sroka 2015-12-15 16:39:43 UTC
Created attachment 1106081 [details]
erratum patch

I fixed the case when user doesn't have any rule in sssd and made a difference between the case when user is searched with rules and when he's searched without rules, so if user doesn't have any rules he is counted as if he doesn't exist, at least from sudo's point of view.

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2016-05-10 21:43:28 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-0853.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.