Bug 1221204 - Review Request: python-docker-scripts - Collection of scripts to help manage Docker
Summary: Review Request: python-docker-scripts - Collection of scripts to help manage ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tomas Tomecek
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-05-13 13:38 UTC by Marek Goldmann
Modified: 2016-04-10 23:29 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-05-18 13:42:06 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
ttomecek: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1323181 0 medium CLOSED Review Request: python-docker-squash - Docker layer squashing tool 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC

Internal Links: 1323181

Description Marek Goldmann 2015-05-13 13:38:50 UTC
Spec URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/python-docker-scripts/1/python-docker-scripts.spec
SRPM URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/python-docker-scripts/1/python-docker-scripts-0.3.4-1.fc22.src.rpm
Fedora Account System Username: goldmann

Description:

A swiss-knife tool that could be useful for people working with Docker.
This is a collection of scripts to deal with Docker images and not only.

Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9723444

Comment 2 Tomas Tomecek 2015-05-14 19:29:47 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
     Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package installs properly.
     Note: No installation test done (mock unavailable)
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
     upstream sources. No licenses found. Please check the source files for
     licenses manually.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
     Note: No known owner of /usr/lib/python2.7/site-
     packages/docker_scripts, /usr/lib/python3.4/site-
     packages/docker_scripts
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python2.7/site-
     packages/docker_scripts, /usr/lib/python3.4/site-
     packages/docker_scripts
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
     Note: Using prebuilt rpms.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
     Note: Cannot find any build in BUILD directory (--prebuilt option?)
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
     process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python3
     -docker-scripts
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python-docker-scripts-0.3.6-1.fc23.noarch.rpm
          python3-docker-scripts-0.3.6-1.fc23.noarch.rpm
          python-docker-scripts-0.3.6-1.fc23.src.rpm
python-docker-scripts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US swiss -> swiz, Swiss, swigs
python-docker-scripts.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary docker-scripts
python3-docker-scripts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US swiss -> swiz, Swiss, swigs
python3-docker-scripts.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary docker-scripts3
python-docker-scripts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US swiss -> swiz, Swiss, swigs
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.




Requires
--------
python3-docker-scripts (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/python3
    python(abi)
    python3-docker-py
    python3-setuptools
    python3-six

python-docker-scripts (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/python
    python(abi)
    python-docker-py
    python-setuptools
    python-six



Provides
--------
python3-docker-scripts:
    python3-docker-scripts

python-docker-scripts:
    python-docker-scripts



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/goldmann/docker-scripts/archive/0.3.6.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : ba97e569526f615c79f2ffd897390624d14e53a4caa1feb85b99436573cd1c89
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : ba97e569526f615c79f2ffd897390624d14e53a4caa1feb85b99436573cd1c89


# Notes

Please correct this:

```
$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/docker_scripts/
file /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/docker_scripts is not owned by any package
```

manpage would be also nice (not required)

Otherwise LGTM.

Comment 3 Marek Goldmann 2015-05-15 06:33:39 UTC
Thanks for the review!

Spec URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/python-docker-scripts/3/python-docker-scripts.spec
SRPM URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/python-docker-scripts/3/python-docker-scripts-0.3.7-1.fc22.src.rpm

Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9749133

Changes:

- Upstream release 0.3.7
- Make sure the /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/docker_scripts
  is owned by this package

Man page will be probably added later.

Comment 4 Marek Goldmann 2015-05-18 06:20:29 UTC
Thank you!

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: python-docker-scripts
Short Description: Collection of scripts to help manage Docker
Upstream URL: https://github.com/goldmann/docker-scripts
Owners: goldmann
Branches: f21 f22 epel7

Comment 5 Gwyn Ciesla 2015-05-18 12:43:20 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 6 Marek Goldmann 2015-05-18 13:42:06 UTC
Thanks, built for Rawhide.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.