Bug 1222455 - ICU: integer overflow via incorrect state size
Summary: ICU: integer overflow via incorrect state size
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1176200
Alias: None
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Red Hat Product Security
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1222456
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-05-18 09:14 UTC by Martin Prpič
Modified: 2019-09-29 13:32 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-05-19 06:40:33 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Martin Prpič 2015-05-18 09:14:49 UTC
An unspecified integer overflow via incorrect state size was fixed in Debian's ICU package:

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784773

Comment 1 Salvatore Bonaccorso 2015-05-19 06:25:39 UTC
Hi Martin,

(In reply to Martin Prpic from comment #0)
> An unspecified integer overflow via incorrect state size was fixed in
> Debian's ICU package:
> 
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784773

Should that be CVE-2014-8147? The bug subject in the Debian BTS referred to CVE-2015-8146 and CVE-2015-8147 but the assigned CVEs seem to be CVE-2014-8146 and CVE-2014-8147.

https://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=143081399320763&w=2

Regards,
Salvatore

Comment 2 Tomas Hoger 2015-05-19 06:30:37 UTC
Exactly, these do look like CVE id typos (2014 vs. 2015).  Can you get the Debian side cleaned-up?

Comment 3 Tomas Hoger 2015-05-19 06:40:33 UTC
Duplicate of bug 1176200 caused by typo in CVE id.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1176200 ***

Comment 4 Salvatore Bonaccorso 2015-05-19 06:58:54 UTC
Hi Tomas,

(In reply to Tomas Hoger from comment #2)
> Exactly, these do look like CVE id typos (2014 vs. 2015).  Can you get the
> Debian side cleaned-up?

Yes. They waere already right in the tracker, but the subject was wrong, so fixed that now.

Comment 5 Tomas Hoger 2015-05-19 07:19:58 UTC
I posted request to reject 2015 ids:

http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q2/490
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/05/19/3


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.