Currently, fedora 22 ships lmms-1.0.3 The lmms package should be updated to ship lmms-1.1.3
Created attachment 1032445 [details] modified spec file
Created attachment 1032446 [details] libexec rebased patch
Created attachment 1032447 [details] vst_nowine rebase patch
Created attachment 1032448 [details] updated source file
The lmms package directory is now composed of: lmms-1.1.3-libexecdir.patch lmms-1.1.3-vst-nowine.patch lmms.spec sources all lmms-1.0.3*.patch files have been removed. I reeanbled all the demo songs and all the samples. These samples are need for songs downloaded from lmms.io website. I update version of lmms to the last available one: 1.1.3
lmms-1.1.3-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lmms-1.1.3-1.fc22
Thanks. I saw that all the samples and example songs have been removed from lmms (in the README.fedora) ? Why are these files removed ? They are part of the lmms archive and so are covered by the lmms license. Or maybe I am wrong ?
(In reply to ycollet from comment #7) > Thanks. > I saw that all the samples and example songs have been removed from lmms (in > the README.fedora) ? > Why are these files removed ? They are part of the lmms archive and so are > covered by the lmms license. Or maybe I am wrong ? First a general remark: ianal, but putting files from various sources in an archive together with some license doesn't magically change the license for the included files. As you can see at the beginning of the spec file, we've had a hard time figuring out the license for the lmms package: lmms itself is licensed under GPLv2+, but it includes various code parts from elsewhere, under different licenses. Regarding the included multimedia files, the situation was even worse: most file formats (including, unfortunately, the mmp and mmpz format) don't foresee a way of specifying the license the file is under. After some discussion (see http://sourceforge.net/p/lmms/mailman/lmms-devel/thread/49790675.5020701@gmx.de/), it was decided to drop all included files, because their license situation was quite unclear. It is up to the upstream project to give proper information about the origin and the license for everything that is not directly created as part of the project (and thus covered by its main license) but copied from external sources. If such information is given, we can include these parts again, file-by-file. That said, and looking at the current tarball, there are files stating licenses for some (but not all) of the included demo projects. These can possibly be re-added to the package, however it is unclear to me how useful that is when e.g. the samples are still missing.
Thanks for these informations. Maybe you should put the content of the previous message in the README.fedora file ? Best regards, YC
Package lmms-1.1.3-1.fc22: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing lmms-1.1.3-1.fc22' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9602/lmms-1.1.3-1.fc22 then log in and leave karma (feedback).
lmms-1.1.3-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.