Bug 122937 - if language it Portuguese(Brazilian), default keyboard should be br-abnt2
if language it Portuguese(Brazilian), default keyboard should be br-abnt2
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: anaconda (Show other bugs)
rawhide
i386 Linux
medium Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jeremy Katz
Mike McLean
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2004-05-10 12:03 EDT by Alexandre Oliva
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:10 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-09-22 15:46:41 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Alexandre Oliva 2004-05-10 12:03:46 EDT
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040506

Description of problem:
When booting off the rescue cd for an NFS install and choosing
Portuguese(Brazilian) as the language to be used for the installation,
the default keyboard type is pt-latin1, which is probably
inappropriate for any Brazilian locales, that use either br-abnt2
(most common) or us-acentos (for those who dislike the
Brazilian-standard abnt2 layout like yours truly :-)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
anaconda-10.0-3

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Boot the installer
2.Choose Portuguese(Brazilian)
3.Move on to the keyboard-type selection screen (text mode)
    

Actual Results:  Default is pt-latin

Expected Results:  It should be br-abnt2.  I'm pretty sure it was like
that in some earlier release, and that's the right choice for pt_BR.

Additional info:
Comment 1 Jeremy Katz 2004-05-10 12:22:44 EDT
Fixed in CVS, probably won't make FC2 though (only rebuilding anaconda
if absolutely necessary at this point)
Comment 2 Alexandre Oliva 2004-05-13 04:47:34 EDT
Err...  It seems to me that there was a rebuild, but the fix didn't
make it, or didn't work.
Comment 3 Alexandre Oliva 2004-10-02 15:53:09 EDT
Confirmed fixed.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.