URL and Source0 address are usable. Ok.
Source archive is original (SHA-256: d7b397e2fc07cfb00c1d9a76ee790f07462a3b2cbeb5fc951dfeb134b0ada867). Ok.
Summary verified from lib/HTTP/Headers/Fast.pm. Ok.
Description verified from lib/HTTP/Headers/Fast.pm. OK.
License verified from lib/HTTP/Headers/Fast.pm and LICENSE. Ok.
No XS code, noarch BuildArch is Ok.

TODO: You can remove the command for deleting empty directories in the %install section.

FIX: Build-require `perl(CPAN::Meta)' (Build.PL:15).
FIX: Build-require `perl(CPAN::Meta::Prereqs)' (Build.PL:16).
FIX: Build-require `perl(File::Basename)' (Build.PL:13).
FIX: Build-require `perl(strict)' (Build.PL:8).
FIX: Build-require `perl(utf8)' (Build.PL:10).
FIX: Build-require `perl(warnings)' (Build.PL:9).
FIX: Build-require `perl(MIME::Base64)' (lib/HTTP/Headers/Fast.pm:466).
FIX: Build-require `perl(Storable)' (lib/HTTP/Headers/Fast.pm:357).
FIX: Build-require `perl(Test)' (t/headers.t:4).

All tests pass. Ok.

$ rpmlint perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast.spec ../SRPMS/perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.17-1.fc24.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.17-1.fc24.noarch.rpm 
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint is Ok.

$ rpm -q -lv -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.17-1.fc24.noarch.rpm
drwxr-xr-x    2 root    root                        0 Aug  6 17:04 /usr/share/doc/perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast
-rw-r--r--    1 root    root                     1565 Nov 14  2013 /usr/share/doc/perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast/Changes
-rw-r--r--    1 root    root                     2106 Nov 14  2013 /usr/share/doc/perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast/README.md
drwxr-xr-x    2 root    root                        0 Aug  6 17:04 /usr/share/licenses/perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast
-rw-r--r--    1 root    root                    18449 Nov 14  2013 /usr/share/licenses/perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast/LICENSE
-rw-r--r--    1 root    root                     2704 Aug  6 17:04 /usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Headers::Fast.3pm.gz
drwxr-xr-x    2 root    root                        0 Aug  6 17:04 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTTP
drwxr-xr-x    2 root    root                        0 Aug  6 17:04 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTTP/Headers
-rw-r--r--    1 root    root                    15132 Aug  6 17:04 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTTP/Headers/Fast.pm
File permissions and layout are Ok.

$ rpm -q --requires -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.17-1.fc24.noarch.rpm | sort -f | uniq -c
      1 perl >= 0:5.00800
      1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.0)
      1 perl(Carp)
      1 perl(strict)
      1 perl(warnings)
      1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
      1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
      1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
      1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
FIX: Run-require `perl(HTTP::Date)' (lib/HTTP/Headers/Fast.pm:365).
FIX: Run-require `perl(MIME::Base64)' (lib/HTTP/Headers/Fast.pm:466).
FIX: Run-require `perl(Storable)' (lib/HTTP/Headers/Fast.pm:357).

$ rpm -q --provides -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.17-1.fc24.noarch.rpm | sort -f | uniq -c
      1 perl(HTTP::Headers::Fast) = 0.17
      1 perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast = 0.17-1.fc24
Binary provides are Ok.

Package builds in F24 (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10623584). Ok.

Otherwise the package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guidelines.


Please correct all `FIX' items, consider fixing `TODO' items, and provide new spec file.

Resolution: Package NOT approved.

Any progress? If you don't have time, I could do the package instead of you. I need the package too. Do you want this package in all Fedoras?

(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #2)
> Any progress?
No. There have been developments in Fedora, mostly centered at redhat.cz, which have caused me not to have continued my works on my recent package submissions.

> Do you want this package in all Fedoras?
Fedora, yes, but I am not interested in EPEL.

(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #3)
> (In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #2)
> > Any progress?
> No. There have been developments in Fedora, mostly centered at redhat.cz,
> which have caused me not to have continued my works on my recent package
> submissions.
> 
Had the conditions changed so you will continue in the packaging any soon? Or should I mark this review request as dead?

There was no progress for last month. I close this request.

I will submit corrected packages in a new review.