Bug 1231210 - [New] - xfsprogs should be pulled in as part of vdsm installation.
Summary: [New] - xfsprogs should be pulled in as part of vdsm installation.
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: vdsm
Version: rhgs-3.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: RHGS 3.1.0
Assignee: Bala.FA
QA Contact: RamaKasturi
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1202842
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-06-12 11:52 UTC by RamaKasturi
Modified: 2015-07-29 05:02 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: vdsm-4.16.20-1.1
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-07-29 05:02:49 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHEA-2015:1494 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Red Hat Gluster Storage Console 3.1 Enhancement and bug fixes 2015-07-29 09:24:02 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2015:1495 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Important: Red Hat Gluster Storage 3.1 update 2015-07-29 08:26:26 UTC
oVirt gerrit 42301 0 master MERGED gluster: add xfsprogs as dependency to gluster sub-package Never
oVirt gerrit 42364 0 ovirt-3.5-gluster MERGED gluster: add xfsprogs as dependency to gluster sub-package Never

Description RamaKasturi 2015-06-12 11:52:36 UTC 
Description of problem:
As of now user has to install xfsprogs manually. Since disk provisioning feature requires xfsprogs to be installed for the brick to be created sucessfully from UI.

xfsprogs should be made as dependency package for vdsm so that it gets installed by default.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
vdsm-4.16.16-1.3.el7rhgs.x86_64

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:
xfsprog is not a dependent package for vdsm.

Expected results:
xfsprogs should be made as dependent package for vdsm.

Additional info:
Comment 2 Sahina Bose 2015-06-12 15:42:55 UTC 
Assigning to you Bala, as this is a downstream vdsm spec change.
Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2015-07-29 05:02:49 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1495.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.