Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info:
Patch merged upstream msater at http://review.gluster.org/#/c/9868/ Patch posted upstream 3.7 at http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10673/. Should check why it is not merged.
The patch that fixes this in downstream: https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/#/c/51003/
Patch is merged in downstream.
One more clean up patch is sent(dependent on this BZ). So moving status to POST. Master: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11426/ (Merged) Release-3.7: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11448/ Downstream: https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/#/c/51759/
The dependent patch is also merged in Release-3.7 and in Downstream.
I see that there few instances of gf_log in rdma.c & name.c $ grep -r "gf_log " * src/name.c: gf_log (this->name, GF_LOG_DEBUG, src/name.c: gf_log (this->name, GF_LOG_ERROR, src/rdma.c: gf_log ("rdma", GF_LOG_WARNING, src/rdma.c: gf_log (GF_RDMA_LOG_NAME, GF_LOG_DEBUG, There are only 2 files available under rdma Marking this bug as FailedQA
(In reply to SATHEESARAN from comment #12) > src/rdma.c: gf_log (GF_RDMA_LOG_NAME, GF_LOG_DEBUG, Ignore this line as its commented in the source code.
(In reply to SATHEESARAN from comment #12) > I see that there few instances of gf_log in rdma.c & name.c > > $ grep -r "gf_log " * > src/name.c: gf_log (this->name, GF_LOG_DEBUG, > src/name.c: gf_log (this->name, GF_LOG_ERROR, > src/rdma.c: gf_log ("rdma", > GF_LOG_WARNING, > src/rdma.c: gf_log (GF_RDMA_LOG_NAME, GF_LOG_DEBUG, > > > There are only 2 files available under rdma > > Marking this bug as FailedQA Have sent a patch to upstream master addressing the missing gf_log* http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11607/
(In reply to SATHEESARAN from comment #12) > I see that there few instances of gf_log in rdma.c & name.c > > $ grep -r "gf_log " * > src/name.c: gf_log (this->name, GF_LOG_DEBUG, > src/name.c: gf_log (this->name, GF_LOG_ERROR, > src/rdma.c: gf_log ("rdma", > GF_LOG_WARNING, > src/rdma.c: gf_log (GF_RDMA_LOG_NAME, GF_LOG_DEBUG, > > > There are only 2 files available under rdma > > Marking this bug as FailedQA As decided this bug will be verified with the available changes and I have opened another bug - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242022 - for rest of the log messages porting. Moving this bug back ON_QA for verification
Marking this bug as VERIFIED, as most of the log messages are ported to new logging framework. There are instances of gf_log and gf_log_callingfn, for which I have raised BZ 1242022
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1495.html