Bug 123258 - <para> example grammar and conceptual error
Summary: <para> example grammar and conceptual error
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora Documentation
Classification: Retired
Component: docs-requests
Version: devel
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tammy Fox
QA Contact: Tammy Fox
URL: http://fedora.redhat.com/participate/...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2004-05-14 21:48 UTC by Karsten Wade
Modified: 2009-07-07 04:08 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-08-12 20:58:41 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Fixes grammatical and conceptual error in <para> example. (653 bytes, patch)
2004-05-14 21:49 UTC, Karsten Wade
no flags Details | Diff

Description Karsten Wade 2004-05-14 21:48:35 UTC
Description of problem:

There has been a long-standing grammatical problem on this page,
always been meaning to patch it. :)  Then I realized that the example
was conceptually incorrect; it needed to show &lt;para&gt; in the
rendered example XML, instead of <para>.

## current

<para>This paragraph talk about using the <para> 
tag correctly.<para>

## changed

<para>This paragraph demonstrates using the &lt;para&gt; 
tag correctly.<para>

Does this change make sense?

Patch coming next.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 documentation-guide-0.2.1 (2004-03-18)

Comment 1 Karsten Wade 2004-05-14 21:49:55 UTC
Created attachment 100239 [details]
Fixes grammatical and conceptual error in <para> example.

Comment 2 Tammy Fox 2004-08-12 20:58:41 UTC
I've applied this patch to CVS with some modification. The command
tags are not needed. They were probably cut and pasted incorrectly by
whoever wrote this section.

The change will appear on the website shortly.

Comment 3 eric 2009-07-07 04:08:13 UTC
Ticket moved to allow products to be removed from BZ.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.