Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 123258
<para> example grammar and conceptual error
Last modified: 2009-07-07 00:08:13 EDT
Description of problem:
There has been a long-standing grammatical problem on this page,
always been meaning to patch it. :) Then I realized that the example
was conceptually incorrect; it needed to show <para> in the
rendered example XML, instead of <para>.
<para>This paragraph talk about using the <para>
<para>This paragraph demonstrates using the <para>
Does this change make sense?
Patch coming next.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Created attachment 100239 [details]
Fixes grammatical and conceptual error in <para> example.
I've applied this patch to CVS with some modification. The command
tags are not needed. They were probably cut and pasted incorrectly by
whoever wrote this section.
The change will appear on the website shortly.
Ticket moved to allow products to be removed from BZ.