RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Description of problem:
Customer reports the following spelling/grammar bugs:

Rule ID: xccdf_preupg_rule_others_vcsrepos_check_script
"Find Versin Control System repositories"
should be "Version"

Rule ID: xccdf_preupg_rule_packages_RemovedOptions_grep_check
"Some commandline options are removed or..." 
needs space for "command line"

Rule ID: xccdf_preupg_rule_packages_RemovedOptions_util-linux_check
"Some commandline options are removed or deprecated in some packages. Print list of changes for util-linux." 
needs space for "command line." 
Also the "Print list of changes for util-linux." statement looks like a reminder for the developer...

Rule ID: xccdf_preupg_rule_system_grub_grub
"Content checks whether splash.xpm.gz file exists and backups them"
Maybe "... and if so, backs it up."

"INPLACERISK: SLIGHT: File splash.xpm.gz was backuped for inplace upgrade case and editing grub options"
Maybe "splash.xpm.gz was backed up to enable an inplace upgrade" ??

@pstodulk, no problem, but wouldn't that make this bug actually a duplicate of the others?  My suggestion would be to close this and inform customer that the errors will be fixed (tracked by 2 separate tickets: bug 1253267 and bug 1360824).

I have verified thatcurrent repo (0d17e80) already contains fixes of problems reported by Karl above.

I guess not, because here are explicitly mentioned some typos and I prefer keep it opened now in this phase.

Added bug-specific static checks to /CoreOS/preupgrade-assistant-el6toel7/smoke/static

Ran on x86_64 with preupgrade-assistant-el6toel7-0.6.56-1.el6

All checks passed.

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2016-2618.html