Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1233978

Summary: [GSS](6.1.z) Operators on java.lang.Comparable object doesn't work if JIT is enable
Product: [Retired] JBoss BRMS Platform 6 Reporter: Alessandro Lazarotti <alazarot>
Component: BREAssignee: Mario Fusco <mfusco>
Status: CLOSED EOL QA Contact: Marek Winkler <mwinkler>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 6.1.0CC: etirelli, kverlaen, lpetrovi, mwinkler
Target Milestone: CR1   
Target Release: 6.1.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1233976 Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-03-27 20:06:12 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1233976    
Bug Blocks: 1249859, 1249860    
Attachments:
Description Flags
reproducer none

Description Alessandro Lazarotti 2015-06-19 22:05:34 UTC 
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1233976 +++

Description of problem:
It is the same problem reported at https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-37, but it was not really solved.

As commented at: 
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-37?focusedCommentId=12928781&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-12928781

.. the fix only works for parameterized types. If the compareTo uses as method signature plain objects, it does not work.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
6.2


How reproducible:
Always after that JIT is called.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run the attached reproducer please. After some cycles the issue happens


Actual results:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.joda.time.LocalDate.compareTo(Lorg/joda/time/LocalDate;)I
org.drools.rule.constraint.MvelConstraint.evaluate(MvelConstraint.java:200)

Expected results:
Rule execution working


Additional info:

--- Additional comment from Alessandro Lazarotti on 2015-06-19 18:03:14 EDT ---
Comment 1 Alessandro Lazarotti 2015-06-19 22:06:14 UTC 
Created attachment 1041070 [details]
reproducer
Comment 3 Mario Fusco 2015-08-10 14:32:55 UTC 
Fix cherry-picked to 6.2.x branch by https://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools/commit/42753e200
Comment 5 Marek Winkler 2015-08-31 16:46:34 UTC 
Verified in BRMS 6.1.3.CR1.