REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/11438 (gfapi : symlink resolution for glfs_object) posted (#1) for review on release-3.7 by jiffin tony Thottan (jthottan)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/11438 (gfapi : symlink resolution for glfs_object) posted (#2) for review on release-3.7 by jiffin tony Thottan (jthottan)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/11438 (gfapi : symlink resolution for glfs_object) posted (#3) for review on release-3.7 by jiffin tony Thottan (jthottan)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/11438 (gfapi : symlink resolution for glfs_object) posted (#4) for review on release-3.7 by jiffin tony Thottan (jthottan)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/11438 (gfapi : symlink resolution for glfs_object) posted (#5) for review on release-3.7 by jiffin tony Thottan (jthottan)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/11438 (gfapi : symlink resolution for glfs_object) posted (#6) for review on release-3.7 by jiffin tony Thottan (jthottan)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/11438 (gfapi : symlink resolution for glfs_object) posted (#7) for review on release-3.7 by jiffin tony Thottan (jthottan)
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/11438 committed in release-3.7 by Niels de Vos (ndevos) ------ commit 49c4b7f750e94aee22d892a7171ed2ad291559e3 Author: Jiffin Tony Thottan <jthottan> Date: Thu Jun 25 15:04:18 2015 +0530 gfapi : symlink resolution for glfs_object Generally posix expects symlink should be resolved, before performing an acl related operation. This patch introduces a new api glfs_h_resolve_symlink() which will do the same. backport of http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11410/1 >Change-Id: Ieee645154455a732edfb2c28834021bab4248810 >BUG: 1209735 >Signed-off-by: Jiffin Tony Thottan <jthottan> Change-Id: I13a83f37a9e59418fd8eb4bf2d44f828515beabf BUG: 1236269 Signed-off-by: Jiffin Tony Thottan <jthottan> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/11438 Reviewed-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos> Tested-by: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins.com>
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.7.3, please open a new bug report. glusterfs-3.7.3 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution. [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.devel/12078 [2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.user