Bug 1238979 - Though nfs-ganesha is not selected while installation, packages is getting installed
Summary: Though nfs-ganesha is not selected while installation, packages is getting in...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: build
Version: rhgs-3.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: RHGS 3.1.0
Assignee: Sreenath G
QA Contact: RajeshReddy
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1202842
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-07-03 07:52 UTC by RajeshReddy
Modified: 2016-07-13 22:34 UTC (History)
12 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-07-29 05:09:14 UTC
Embargoed:
sgirijan: needinfo+


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2015:1495 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Important: Red Hat Gluster Storage 3.1 update 2015-07-29 08:26:26 UTC

Description RajeshReddy 2015-07-03 07:52:53 UTC
Description of problem:
=============
Though nfs-ganesha is not selected while installation, package is getting installed  

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
================
glusterfs-ganesha-3.7.1-6.el6rhs.x86_64


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.Try to install Gluster using iso and do not select nfs-ganesha but nfs-ganesha rpm is getting installed on the machine 

rhs-hpc-srv1.lab.eng.blr.redhat.com
[root@rhs-hpc-srv1 bitrot]# rpm -qa | grep glusterfs
glusterfs-rdma-3.7.1-6.el6rhs.x86_64
samba-vfs-glusterfs-4.1.17-7.el6rhs.x86_64
glusterfs-api-3.7.1-6.el6rhs.x86_64
glusterfs-server-3.7.1-6.el6rhs.x86_64
glusterfs-cli-3.7.1-6.el6rhs.x86_64
glusterfs-3.7.1-6.el6rhs.x86_64
glusterfs-client-xlators-3.7.1-6.el6rhs.x86_64
glusterfs-geo-replication-3.7.1-6.el6rhs.x86_64
glusterfs-ganesha-3.7.1-6.el6rhs.x86_64
glusterfs-libs-3.7.1-6.el6rhs.x86_64
glusterfs-fuse-3.7.1-6.el6rhs.x86_64

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 2 Sreenath G 2015-07-06 10:26:42 UTC
Please note that the glusterfs package (@glusterfs-fuse) has "Requires: nfs-ganesha-gluster" which pulls in the nfs-ganesha.

Comment 3 Kaleb KEITHLEY 2015-07-07 11:37:22 UTC
upstream glusterfs-fuse does not have that Requires:

Where did that come from?

Comment 4 Sreenath G 2015-07-07 11:47:10 UTC
Hi Kaleb,

     I referred the ln 592 in glusterfs.spec [1]. Sorry, it is under "ganesha" section (and not in fuse), so its actually in "glusterfs-ganesha" sub-pkg

[1] http://dist-git.app.eng.bos.redhat.com/cgit/rpms/glusterfs/tree/glusterfs.spec?h=rhgs-3.1-rhel-6

Comment 5 Kaleb KEITHLEY 2015-07-07 11:57:29 UTC
yes, that's actually correct.

The glusterfs-ganesha subpackage has "Requires: nfs-ganesha-gluster"

This is the Gluster FSAL in nfs-ganesha, which in turn requires nfs-ganesha.

If Ganesha is not selected for installation then the glusterfs-ganesha subpackage should not be installed.

Comment 6 Rejy M Cyriac 2015-07-08 08:43:50 UTC
Sreenath,

Can we set the glusterfs-ganesha subpackage to be an optional install one ?

Comment 7 Niels de Vos 2015-07-08 08:52:17 UTC
Could explain how you did try the non-Ganesha installation?

glusterfs-ganesha should be an optional package, but if that gets installed by default, it will pull in nfs-ganesha too. In that case, we need to find out what causes the installation of glusterfs-ganesha and address that.

Comment 9 Sreenath G 2015-07-08 17:38:36 UTC
Will move glusterfs-ganesha sub-pkg to RH-Gluster-NFS-Ganesha comps group in next ISO spin

Comment 11 Sreenath G 2015-07-09 07:43:07 UTC
glusterfs-ganesha sub-pkg to RH-Gluster-NFS-Ganesha comps group in latest RHGS-3.1-RHEL-6 ISO [1]

[1] http://download.eng.bos.redhat.com/composes/nightly/RHGSS-3.1-20150708.n.0/3/RHS/x86_64/iso/RHGSS-3.1-20150708.n.0-RHS-x86_64-DVD1.iso

Comment 12 RajeshReddy 2015-07-10 11:50:59 UTC
Tested with given ISO and by default nfs-ganesha package is not installed so marking this bug as verified

Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2015-07-29 05:09:14 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1495.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.