Note: This is not a show stopper it puts in a delay and then passes the user thru. In the Samba archives it is shown as a "ghost failure", with no solution provided. It may be related to case mangling of the password, where a failure is logged on each combination of trying to convert the password. At a higher level, the number of machines access the server can multiply the delay factory and in a production environment cause problems. version: Version to 2.0.7 From syslog: Apr 8 13:27:18 kesrith PAM_pwdb[32520]: authentication failure; (uid=0) -> henris for samba service Apr 8 13:27:21 kesrith last message repeated 3 times Apr 8 13:27:26 kesrith PAM_pwdb[32521]: authentication failure; (uid=0) -> henris for samba service from log.smb [2000/04/08 13:27:20, 1] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(909) Rejecting user 'henris': authentication failed [2000/04/08 13:27:22, 1] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(909) Rejecting user 'henris': authentication failed from /etc/pam.d/samba auth required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so nullok shadow audit account required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so note: I added the audit. I have four Linux/Samba boxes that perform the same error. The all users except one(for testing) have matching acounts/passwords on both servers/ clients (clients are both W95a).I dont use encryption on Windows,I dont use smbpasswd or usermap on samba. I have seen this error in the following: RPM's from Redhat and Samba compiled from source from samba and RH (2.0.6) samba-2.0.7Pre2 (compiled w/ -lpam) samba-TNG-0.11 (compiled w/ -lpam) As I said in the begining that it doesnt halt the connection it merely induces a brief delay, coughs up the error message. In a production environment the delay may well be worse or unacceptable. If required I will add my smb.confs from all machines. Disabling pam authentication makes this go away, but then why have pam anyway. This is a duplicate of bug #10666 which is against RHL 6.2
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 10666 ***