Bug 1241088 - Review Request: python-oslo-reports - Oslo reports library
Summary: Review Request: python-oslo-reports - Oslo reports library
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Haïkel Guémar
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: RDO-LIBERTY-REVIEWS
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-07-08 12:17 UTC by Lukas Bezdicka
Modified: 2015-09-30 17:14 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-09-30 17:14:20 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
karlthered: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Lukas Bezdicka 2015-07-08 12:17:04 UTC
Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~social/python-oslo-reports.spec
SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~social/python-oslo-reports-0.2.0-1.fc22.src.rpm
Description: Oslo reports library
Fedora Account System Username: social

Comment 1 Haïkel Guémar 2015-07-08 12:18:32 UTC
Note that approval will be delayed up until F23 is branched (next week)

Comment 2 Thomas Oulevey 2015-07-14 10:14:54 UTC
This package looks good.

Comment 3 Haïkel Guémar 2015-07-15 08:38:56 UTC
Please replace this line "%{python2_sitelib}" by
%{python2_sitelib}/%{pypi_name}-%{version}-py*.*.egg-info


Should be good after that.

Comment 4 Haïkel Guémar 2015-08-12 19:42:13 UTC
This should be fine, too:
%{python2_sitelib}/.*.egg-info (the current line means that your package is owning the whole site-package directory)

BuildRequires: python-setuptools is missing

Comment 5 Alan Pevec (Fedora) 2015-08-18 18:28:16 UTC
python3 subpackage is now mandatory: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Python_Version_Support
Also latest release is https://pypi.python.org/pypi/oslo.reports/0.4.0 

While under review, RDO Liberyt dist-git will be:
https://github.com/openstack-packages/python-oslo-reports/tree/rdo-liberty

Comment 6 Haïkel Guémar 2015-09-05 10:37:57 UTC
@Lukas: could you update this review, please?

Comment 8 Lukas Bezdicka 2015-09-14 12:01:52 UTC
SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~social/python-oslo-reports-0.5.0-1.src.rpm

Comment 9 Haïkel Guémar 2015-09-14 17:32:08 UTC
Four issues that must be fixed:                                      
* missing requirements for python3, please disable python3 subpackage until it's fixed                 
%global with_python3 0                                                          
* missing dist tag                                                     
Release:  1%{?dist}
* Drop %{python2_sitelib} and %{python3_sitelib} from %files as they should not be owned by python modules packages.
* It also needs a changelog entry.

These are the last mile before approval.

Comment 11 Haïkel Guémar 2015-09-16 08:42:14 UTC
Two changes before import:
* please disable python3 subpackage before import (missing python3-oslo-serialization)
* change Source0 to https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/o/%{pypi_name}/%{pypi_name}-%{version}.tar.gz for consistency with other oslo package


I hereby approve this package into Fedora Packages Collection, please submit a SCM request.



Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- Package installs properly.
  Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
  See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines


===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Apache (v2.0)". Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/haikel/1241088-python-oslo-reports/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
     process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[ ]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python2
     -oslo-reports , python2-oslo-reports-doc , python3-oslo-reports
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: Mock build failed
     See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#rpmlint
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Installation errors
-------------------
INFO: mock.py version 1.2.10 starting (python version = 2.7.8)...
Start: init plugins
INFO: selinux enabled
Finish: init plugins
Start: run
Start: chroot init
INFO: calling preinit hooks
INFO: enabled root cache
INFO: enabled dnf cache
Start: cleaning dnf metadata
Finish: cleaning dnf metadata
INFO: enabled ccache
Mock Version: 1.2.10
INFO: Mock Version: 1.2.10
Finish: chroot init
INFO: installing package(s): /home/haikel/1241088-python-oslo-reports/results/python2-oslo-reports-0.5.0-1.fc24.noarch.rpm /home/haikel/1241088-python-oslo-reports/results/python2-oslo-reports-doc-0.5.0-1.fc24.noarch.rpm /home/haikel/1241088-python-oslo-reports/results/python3-oslo-reports-0.5.0-1.fc24.noarch.rpm
ERROR: Command failed. See logs for output.
 # /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ --releasever 23 install /home/haikel/1241088-python-oslo-reports/results/python2-oslo-reports-0.5.0-1.fc24.noarch.rpm /home/haikel/1241088-python-oslo-reports/results/python2-oslo-reports-doc-0.5.0-1.fc24.noarch.rpm /home/haikel/1241088-python-oslo-reports/results/python3-oslo-reports-0.5.0-1.fc24.noarch.rpm --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python2-oslo-reports-0.5.0-1.fc24.noarch.rpm
          python2-oslo-reports-doc-0.5.0-1.fc24.noarch.rpm
          python3-oslo-reports-0.5.0-1.fc24.noarch.rpm
          python-oslo-reports-0.5.0-1.fc24.src.rpm
python2-oslo-reports.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Openstack -> Open stack, Open-stack, Opens tack
python3-oslo-reports.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Openstack -> Open stack, Open-stack, Opens tack
python-oslo-reports.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Openstack -> Open stack, Open-stack, Opens tack
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.




Requires
--------
python2-oslo-reports-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):

python3-oslo-reports (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    python(abi)
    python3-babel
    python3-jinja2
    python3-oslo-i18n
    python3-oslo-serialization
    python3-oslo-utils
    python3-psutil
    python3-six

python2-oslo-reports (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    python(abi)
    python-babel
    python-jinja2
    python-oslo-i18n
    python-oslo-serialization
    python-oslo-utils
    python-psutil
    python-six



Provides
--------
python2-oslo-reports-doc:
    python2-oslo-reports-doc

python3-oslo-reports:
    python3-oslo-reports

python2-oslo-reports:
    python-oslo-reports
    python2-oslo-reports



Source checksums
----------------
http://tarballs.openstack.org/oslo.reports/oslo.reports-0.5.0.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : acc8a11422536fccbd1eda4af6b70c219e994ebcf357719480d82981f518672f
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : acc8a11422536fccbd1eda4af6b70c219e994ebcf357719480d82981f518672f


Generated by fedora-review 0.5.3 (bcf15e3) last change: 2015-05-04
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1241088 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby
Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6

Comment 12 Lukas Bezdicka 2015-09-16 11:45:51 UTC
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: python-oslo-reports
New Branches:
Owners: social apevec chandankumar
InitialCC:

Comment 13 Gwyn Ciesla 2015-09-17 12:52:37 UTC
If this is a new package, please use a new package request.

Comment 14 Lukas Bezdicka 2015-09-17 13:09:02 UTC
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: python-oslo-reports
Short Description: Oslo reports library
Upstream URL: http://launchpad.net/oslo
Owners: social apevec chandankumar
Branches: 
InitialCC:

Comment 15 Gwyn Ciesla 2015-09-17 13:25:01 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.