Bug 1241638 – OpenScap needs an obsoletes

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.

Bug 1241638 - OpenScap needs an obsoletes

Summary:	OpenScap needs an obsoletes

Status:	CLOSED ERRATA

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Satellite 6
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	Packaging (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	6.1.0
Hardware:	Unspecified Unspecified

Priority	unspecified Severity high (vote)
Target Milestone:	6.1.4
Target Release:	Unused
Assigned To:	Bryan Kearney
QA Contact:	Kedar Bidarkar
Docs Contact:	David O'Brien

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:	Triaged

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2015-07-09 12:41 EDT by Bryan Kearney
Modified:	2017-02-23 14:51 EST (History)
CC List:	5 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-11-19 10:56:38 EST
Type:	Bug
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

External Trackers
Tracker	ID	Priority	Status	Summary	Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata	RHBA-2015:2474	normal	SHIPPED_LIVE	Satellite 6.1.4 bug fix update	2015-11-19 15:45:48 EST

Groups: None (edit)

Description Bryan Kearney 2015-07-09 12:41:18 EDT

On 07/09/2015 07:48 AM, Bryan Kearney wrote:
> (10:44:38 AM) bryan_kearney: kk.. thanks
> (10:44:41 AM) slukasik: and input from selinux team
> (10:44:52 AM) slukasik: however, there is bug in your specfile
> (10:45:03 AM) slukasik: We need to have following line:
> (10:45:07 AM) slukasik: Obsoletes: openscap-selinux
> (10:45:21 AM) slukasik: in openscap-scanner sub-package section
> (10:45:30 AM) slukasik: It must not go to any other sections
> (10:45:41 AM) bryan_kearney: kk.. I will send it along to mike
> (10:45:48 AM) slukasik: thank You!
> (10:46:06 AM) slukasik: we need this obsolete to not break existing
> instalations ...

Comment 1 RHEL Product and Program Management 2015-07-09 13:04:55 EDT

Since this issue was entered in Red Hat Bugzilla, the release flag has been
set to ? to ensure that it is properly evaluated for this release.

Comment 5 David O'Brien 2015-08-20 01:22:46 EDT

There's not enough info here for me to create a useful rel note. Can someone please provide suitable doc text?

thanks

Comment 6 Brad Buckingham 2015-08-20 09:12:07 EDT

A rel note shouldn't be needed for this one; therefore, removing the sat61-release-notes blocker.

Comment 7 Kedar Bidarkar 2015-09-01 08:37:35 EDT

Please let me know, what exactly needs to be tested here and how.

Comment 8 Bryan Kearney 2015-09-01 09:14:31 EDT

We can either set up a test where you have the old openscap=selinx and this removes it, or you can just verify the obsoletes with

rpm -q --obsoletes openscap-scanner

Comment 9 Kedar Bidarkar 2015-09-01 11:30:56 EDT

I believe this is not yet fixed, FAILEDQA


As mentioned in comment8, I believe installing openscap-scanner should remove openscap-selinux.


I didn't find openscap-selinux package from rhel-base or from brewroot, so decided to check with just "rpm -q --obsoletes openscap-scanner" but no luck.


For RHEL6: 

[root@xyzabc ~]# rpm -qp --obsoletes ./openscap-scanner-1.2.4-1.el6_6sat.x86_64.rpm 
[root@xyzabc ~]# 

we don't see the obsoletes


For RHEL7:

[root@xyzabc  ~]# rpm -qp --obsoletes ./openscap-scanner-1.2.4-1.el7sat.x86_64.rpm
[root@xyzabc ~]# 

we don't see the obsoletes

Comment 15 Corey Welton 2015-11-04 13:37:16 EST

Verified in 6.1.4 compose 2

[root@rhsm-qe-3 ~]# rpm -q --obsoletes openscap-scanner
openscap-selinux

Comment 19 errata-xmlrpc 2015-11-19 10:56:38 EST

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015:2474

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.