When several SwitchYard applications that contain a Camel service, each referring to a different CDI bean (<to uri="bean:cdiBeanX"/>) in the Camel route, are deployed at the same time via the Management Console, and then are invoked in parallel, some of them frequently fail with the following error: ----- 13:18:49,408 WARN [org.apache.camel.util.ObjectHelper] (http-/127.0.0.1:8080-1) Cannot find class: cdiBean2 13:18:49,410 ERROR [org.apache.camel.processor.DefaultErrorHandler] (http-/127.0.0.1:8080-1) Failed delivery for (MessageId: ID-rilke-local-57043-1436501829124-3-3 on ExchangeId: ID-rilke-local-57043-1436501829124-3-4). Exhausted after delivery attempt: 1 caught: org.apache.camel.NoSuchBeanException: No bean could be found in the registry for: cdiBean2: org.apache.camel.NoSuchBeanException: No bean could be found in the registry for: cdiBean2 at org.apache.camel.component.bean.RegistryBean.getBean(RegistryBean.java:87) [camel-core-2.10.0.redhat-60061.jar:2.10.0.redhat-60061] at org.apache.camel.component.bean.BeanProcessor.process(BeanProcessor.java:77) [camel-core-2.10.0.redhat-60061.jar:2.10.0.redhat-60061] at org.apache.camel.util.AsyncProcessorHelper.process(AsyncProcessorHelper.java:99) [camel-core-2.10.0.redhat-60061.jar:2.10.0.redhat-60061] at org.apache.camel.component.bean.BeanProcessor.process(BeanProcessor.java:67) [camel-core-2.10.0.redhat-60061.jar:2.10.0.redhat-60061] at org.apache.camel.impl.ProcessorEndpoint.onExchange(ProcessorEndpoint.java:101) [camel-core-2.10.0.redhat-60061.jar:2.10.0.redhat-60061] at org.apache.camel.impl.ProcessorEndpoint$1.process(ProcessorEndpoint.java:71) [camel-core-2.10.0.redhat-60061.jar:2.10.0.redhat-60061] at org.apache.camel.util.AsyncProcessorConverterHelper$ProcessorToAsyncProcessorBridge.process(AsyncProcessorConverterHelper.java:61) [camel-core-2.10.0.redhat-60061.jar:2.10.0.redhat-60061] ... -----
It looks like BZ 1197881 (SWITCHYARD-2610) fixed the issue already.
Tom Cunningham <tcunning> updated the status of jira ENTESB-3592 to Resolved
Reproduced, verified as in Comment #3