Bug 1243377 - FSAL_GLUSTER : cthon lock test failure for pnfs mount
Summary: FSAL_GLUSTER : cthon lock test failure for pnfs mount
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CANTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: nfs-ganesha
Version: rhgs-3.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Jiffin
QA Contact: storage-qa-internal@redhat.com
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1243376
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-07-15 10:45 UTC by Jiffin
Modified: 2023-09-14 03:02 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1243376
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-11-15 05:00:40 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jiffin 2015-07-15 10:45:32 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1243376 +++

Description of problem:
When cthon lock test run on pnfs mount it fails at the TEST no7

Test #7 - Test parent/child mutual exclusion.
	Parent: 7.0  - F_TLOCK [             ffc,               9] PASSED.
	Parent: Wrote 'aaaa eh' to testfile [ 4092, 7 ].
	Parent: Now free child to run, should block on lock.
	Parent: Check data in file to insure child blocked.
tlock: short read (got 0, expected 7)
	Child:  7.3  - F_LOCK  [             ffc,               9] PASSED.
	Child:  Write child's version of the data and release lock.

** PARENT pass 1 results: 22/22 pass, 0/0 warn, 0/0 fail (pass/total).

**  CHILD pass 1 results: 45/45 pass, 0/0 warn, 0/0 fail (pass/total).
lock tests failed


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
mailine

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. create a volume
2. export the volume using nfs-ganesha
3. mount the volume using pnfs
4. Run cthon lock test on the mount


Actual results:
It is failing at testno7

Expected results:
It should pass successfully

Additional info:
It is not tested in normal nfs4.1 mount(may be issue exists in that too)

Comment 2 Kaleb KEITHLEY 2016-06-20 11:50:49 UTC
pNFS tech preview?

Comment 7 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-14 03:02:04 UTC
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.