RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1243788 - wait fails on pid of co-process in interactive mode
Summary: wait fails on pid of co-process in interactive mode
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: mksh
Version: 7.1
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Michal Hlavinka
QA Contact: Jan Kepler
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 726199
Blocks: 728900 799362 1465925 1473612
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-07-16 10:06 UTC by Martin Kyral
Modified: 2018-04-10 17:44 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: mksh-46-7.el7
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 726199
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-04-10 17:44:24 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2018:0951 0 None None None 2018-04-10 17:44:35 UTC

Description Martin Kyral 2015-07-16 10:06:00 UTC
The same bug is present in mksh (in interactive mode only)

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #726199 +++

Description of problem:

Performing a wait on the pid of a co-process fails in the following circumstance:
    #! /bin/ksh

    ls -l |&a
    pid=$!

    tee -a /tmp/out <&p

    wait $pid
    print $?

The wait's return value is always 127.  It does not matter whether the co-process exits with a successful value (e.g., "ls -l") or an unsuccessful value (e.g., "ls -l does-not-exist"); 127 is always returned.

POSIX documentation on wait(1) (http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/wait.html) states "If one or more pid operands are specified that represent unknown process IDs, wait shall treat them as if they were known process IDs that exited with exit status 127" and later on (in "Exit Status") indicates that 127 is returned only if "[t]he command identified by the last pid operand specified is unknown."

---------------

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
mksh-46-5.el7

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
Run sample code above using mksh -i
  
Actual results:
Return value of wait is always 127.

Expected results:
wait returns status of specified command

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2018-04-10 17:44:24 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:0951


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.