RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1243789 - wait fails on pid of co-process in interactive mode
Summary: wait fails on pid of co-process in interactive mode
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: mksh
Version: 6.7
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Michal Hlavinka
QA Contact: BaseOS QE - Apps
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 726199
Blocks: 728900 799362
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-07-16 10:06 UTC by Martin Kyral
Modified: 2017-12-06 12:03 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 726199
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-12-06 12:03:05 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Martin Kyral 2015-07-16 10:06:02 UTC
The same bug is present in mksh (in interactive mode only)

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #726199 +++

Description of problem:

Performing a wait on the pid of a co-process fails in the following circumstance:
    #! /bin/ksh

    ls -l |&a
    pid=$!

    tee -a /tmp/out <&p

    wait $pid
    print $?

The wait's return value is always 127.  It does not matter whether the co-process exits with a successful value (e.g., "ls -l") or an unsuccessful value (e.g., "ls -l does-not-exist"); 127 is always returned.

POSIX documentation on wait(1) (http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/wait.html) states "If one or more pid operands are specified that represent unknown process IDs, wait shall treat them as if they were known process IDs that exited with exit status 127" and later on (in "Exit Status") indicates that 127 is returned only if "[t]he command identified by the last pid operand specified is unknown."

---------------

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
mksh-39-9.el6

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
Run sample code above using mksh -i
  
Actual results:
Return value of wait is always 127.

Expected results:
wait returns status of specified command

Comment 2 Jan Kurik 2017-12-06 12:03:05 UTC
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 is in the Production 3 Phase. During the Production 3 Phase, Critical impact Security Advisories (RHSAs) and selected Urgent Priority Bug Fix Advisories (RHBAs) may be released as they become available.

The official life cycle policy can be reviewed here:

http://redhat.com/rhel/lifecycle

This issue does not meet the inclusion criteria for the Production 3 Phase and will be marked as CLOSED/WONTFIX. If this remains a critical requirement, please contact Red Hat Customer Support to request a re-evaluation of the issue, citing a clear business justification. Note that a strong business justification will be required for re-evaluation. Red Hat Customer Support can be contacted via the Red Hat Customer Portal at the following URL:

https://access.redhat.com/


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.