Bug 1244658 - Review Request: dgit - Integration between git and Debian-style archives
Summary: Review Request: dgit - Integration between git and Debian-style archives
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: 22
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-07-20 08:38 UTC by Lubomir Rintel
Modified: 2016-07-19 22:25 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-07-19 17:05:23 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:
zbyszek: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Lubomir Rintel 2015-07-20 08:38:15 UTC
SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/dgit.spec
SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/dgit-1.0-1.fc22.src.rpm

Description:

dgit (with the associated infrastructure) makes it possible to
treat the Debian archive as a git repository:

"dgit push" constructs uploads from git commits

"dgit clone" and "dgit fetch" construct git commits from uploads.

Comment 1 Christopher Meng 2015-07-20 11:25:11 UTC
Just a side note, I tried to package dput and then found it's no longer developed anymore. See Bug 987738.

Comment 2 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2015-07-30 14:34:53 UTC
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated

===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
GPLv3.

[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses
     found. Please check the source files for licenses manually.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
     Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
     /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Debian(debconf, debhelper)
OK.

[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Perl:
[!]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Requires:.
     Note: Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`";
     echo $version)) missing?

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[!]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
     Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments
Pfff. They should really enable tarballs on git.dgit.debian.org.

[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: dgit-1.0-1.fc24.noarch.rpm
          dgit-1.0-1.fc24.src.rpm
dgit.src: W: invalid-url Source0: dgit-1.0.tar.gz
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.



Requires
--------
dgit (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/perl
    coreutils
    curl
    devscripts
    dpkg-dev
    git
    perl(Config)
    perl(Data::Dumper)
    perl(Debian::Dgit)
    perl(Digest::MD5)
    perl(Digest::SHA)
    perl(Dpkg::Control::Hash)
    perl(Dpkg::Vendor)
    perl(Dpkg::Version)
    perl(Exporter)
    perl(File::Basename)
    perl(File::Path)
    perl(File::Temp)
    perl(IO::Handle)
    perl(IPC::Open2)
    perl(JSON)
    perl(LWP::UserAgent)
    perl(POSIX)
    perl(strict)
    perl(warnings)
    tar


Package is APPROVED. Please add the missing perl stanza.

Provides
--------
dgit:
    dgit
    perl(Debian::Dgit)



Generated by fedora-review 0.5.3 (bcf15e3) last change: 2015-05-04
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1244658
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, Perl
Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby
Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6

Comment 3 Lubomir Rintel 2015-08-04 12:41:57 UTC
Thanks for the review.

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: dgit
Short Description: Integration between git and Debian-style archives
Upstream URL: https://browse.dgit.debian.org/dgit.git/
Owners: foo lkundrak
Branches: f21 f22 f23 el6 epel7

Comment 4 Gwyn Ciesla 2015-08-04 13:14:00 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 5 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2016-03-01 21:20:29 UTC
?

Comment 6 Mike McCune 2016-03-28 23:47:57 UTC
This bug was accidentally moved from POST to MODIFIED via an error in automation, please see mmccune with any questions

Comment 7 Fedora End Of Life 2016-07-19 17:05:23 UTC
Fedora 22 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-07-19. Fedora 22 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.