Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 1246128
RHGSS-3.1-RHEL-6-20150722.2-RHS-x86_64-DVD1.iso contains glusterfs-resource-agents which should be removed
Last modified: 2015-07-29 01:13:37 EDT
Description of problem: ----------------------- RHGS 3.1 RC ISO RHGSS-3.1-RHEL-6-20150722.2-RHS-x86_64-DVD1.iso contains package glusterfs-resource-agents which should not be present according to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244432#c3. Please remove this package. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ------------------------------------------------------------- RHGSS-3.1-RHEL-6-20150722.2-RHS-x86_64-DVD1.iso How reproducible: ------------------ 100% Steps to Reproduce: ------------------- 1. Check for package glusterfs-resource-agents in RHGSS-3.1-RHEL-6-20150722.2-RHS-x86_64-DVD1.iso. Actual results: --------------- Package glusterfs-resource-agents is present in RHGS 3.1 ISO. Expected results: ------------------ Package glusterfs-resource-agents is not present in RHGS 3.1 ISO.
glusterfs-resource-agents is part of ISO as it would have been pulled-in by other packages and this is an optional package in ISO and won't get installed by default. This can be explicitly filtered out in next ISO.
glusterfs-resource-agent was getting pulled-in to ISO, but as an optional package. Rremoved in RC2 ISO RHGSS-3.1-RHEL-6-20150725.1
(In reply to Sreenath G from comment #4) > glusterfs-resource-agent was getting pulled-in to ISO, but as an optional > package. > Rremoved in RC2 ISO RHGSS-3.1-RHEL-6-20150725.1 so this package will not be shipped in ISO right ?
(In reply to Siddharth Sharma from comment #5) > (In reply to Sreenath G from comment #4) > > glusterfs-resource-agent was getting pulled-in to ISO, but as an optional > > package. > > Rremoved in RC2 ISO RHGSS-3.1-RHEL-6-20150725.1 > > so this package will not be shipped in ISO right ? Checked in RHGSS-3.1-RHEL-6-20150726.0-RHS-x86_64-DVD1.iso. glusterfs-resource-agents is no longer present in the ISO. Marking as verified.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1495.html