Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Hubbitus/Fedora-packaging/2c03845b48fab39d8dbcf8915c522294353b3f65/SPECS/img2xterm.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.hubbitus.info/Fedora22/img2xterm/img2xterm-0-1.git.e24d136.fc22.src.rpm Description: img2xterm is a program that can display bitmap images on 256-colour terminals by converting them into Unicode block characters and xterm compatible control sequences. Based on software by lachs0r and Xebec for creating colourful cowfiles, img2xterm improves on the colour selection and block printing logic, providing cleaner output on terminals with nice bitmap fonts. img2xterm uses a modified version of the algorithm used in xterm256-conv in order to have an accurate representation of the upper 240 colours used in xterm. Modification was needed in order to fix the range of the grey ramp. Fedora Account System Username: hubbitus
Scratch build fine: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10479959 But it has extravagant license statement "THE STRONGEST PUBLIC LICENSE": https://github.com/rossy/img2xterm/blob/master/img2xterm.c I'm unsure if it may be threated as really free and what fil in License field of spec. Rising FE-legal.
Ugh. I hate joke licenses. Waiting on RH Legal.
RH Legal and I concur, this is non-free as worded. I opened an issue with the upstream in the hopes of resolving this: https://github.com/rossy/img2xterm/issues/7
Thank you.
License issue resolved. Spot thank you.
Changes: https://github.com/Hubbitus/Fedora-packaging/commit/d526407c93063f7f554317d86fec03d322a943b2 Spec: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Hubbitus/Fedora-packaging/d526407c93063f7f554317d86fec03d322a943b2/SPECS/img2xterm.spec Srpm: http://rpm.hubbitus.info/Fedora22/img2xterm/img2xterm-1.0.0-1.fc22.src.rpm
This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag. You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group. Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned and will be closed. Thank you for your patience.
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.