Bug 1247315 - Fix limitation in iproute/ss regarding dual-stack sockets
Summary: Fix limitation in iproute/ss regarding dual-stack sockets
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: iproute
Version: 7.2
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Phil Sutter
QA Contact: Jaroslav Aster
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1244313 (view as bug list)
Depends On: 1247309
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-07-27 18:36 UTC by Phil Sutter
Modified: 2015-11-19 14:42 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: iproute-3.10.0-48.el7
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1247728 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-11-19 14:42:50 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2015:2117 normal SHIPPED_LIVE iproute bug fix and enhancement update 2015-11-19 11:35:06 UTC

Description Phil Sutter 2015-07-27 18:36:06 UTC
When listing listening sockets using 'ss -nlpe', there is no indication about whether an AF_INET6 socket is dual-stack capable, i.e. allows access from IPv4 as well. The following upstream patch solves this issue:

commit f32dc7467fee0b9e55c3fc6e2895d62e881dec55
Author: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
Date:   Wed Jun 24 13:07:20 2015 +0200

    ss: print value of IPV6_V6ONLY socket option if set
    
    If available and set, print 'v6only:1' for AF_INET6 sockets upon request
    of extended information. For IPv6 sockets bound to in6addr_any, this is
    the only way to determine if they will also accept IPv4 requests or not.
    
    Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>

Comment 1 Phil Sutter 2015-07-27 18:38:22 UTC
*** Bug 1244313 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2015-11-19 14:42:50 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2117.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.