Description of problem: Only 1 node was close to being out of disk space(had ~200megs free) all the others had ~7GB free. So if it really was the issue the bug should be open against the scheduler to account for disk space when selecting the node. (from Wesley Hearn) > > Here is the end of the output about the builder pod: > > > > $ oc get pods nodejs-example-3-build -o json > > > > "status": { > > "phase": "Failed", > > "message": "Pod cannot be started due to lack of disk space.", > > "startTime": "2015-07-28T20:49:57Z" > > } > > > > Good ole out of disk space. > > > > To be clear, build 1 failed clearly. Builds 2 & 3 failed but are reported > > as succeeded. > > > > $ oc get builds > > NAME TYPE STATUS POD > > nodejs-example-1 Source Failed nodejs-example-1-build > > nodejs-example-2 Source Complete nodejs-example-2-build > > nodejs-example-3 Source Complete nodejs-example-3-build > > This is running on https://console.stg.openshift.com/console/ Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 3.0.0 How reproducible: Create a project, select the sample (say nodejs-ex) and attempt to build it Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: fails immediately, due to inability to start a pod Expected results: pod starts, build runs, result image pushed Additional info: The project showing this behavior is https://console.stg.openshift.com/console/project/ldpjs/overview
Not clear why you assigned this to me, Paul?
Two things I see on this: 1. The build status doesn't seem to be properly conveyed. The build was failed but marked as completed. 2. A possible bug with the scheduler not taking node disk space into account - I pinged pmorie about that portion
The build status issue was already fixed here: https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/3936 this bug was opened for the scheduler issue, which is really an RFE more than a bug imho.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1252520 ***