Bug 1248873
| Summary: | [whql][netkvm]Job named NDISTest6.5-InvalidPackets failed with HCK on win8-32/win8-64(build 106) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Yu Wang <wyu> | |
| Component: | virtio-win | Assignee: | Yvugenfi <yvugenfi> | |
| virtio-win sub component: | virtio-win-prewhql | QA Contact: | Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs> | |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | Docs Contact: | ||
| Severity: | urgent | |||
| Priority: | urgent | CC: | ailan, lijin, lmiksik, phou, vrozenfe, wyu | |
| Version: | 7.2 | Keywords: | Regression | |
| Target Milestone: | rc | |||
| Target Release: | --- | |||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
| OS: | Unspecified | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||
| Doc Text: |
NO_DOCS
|
Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 1609607 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-11-04 08:48:17 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Embargoed: | ||||
| Bug Depends On: | ||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1288337, 1609607 | |||
|
Description
Yu Wang
2015-07-31 05:21:39 UTC
win10-64 guest hit the similar issue when run 105 netkvm whql test job "NDISTest6.5-InvalidPackets",job failed with queues=4 but passed with single queue. Please retest with latest build Hello Yan, Rerun the test case NDIS6.5 - InvalidPackets passed with multiqueue on build 111. -win8.1_32 Rerun the test case NDIS6.5 - InvalidPackets passed with multiqueue on build 111. -win10_64 Best Regards! Peixiu Hou (In reply to Peixiu Hou from comment #9) > Hello Yan, > > Rerun the test case NDIS6.5 - InvalidPackets passed with multiqueue on build > 111. -win8.1_32 > > Rerun the test case NDIS6.5 - InvalidPackets passed with multiqueue on build > 111. -win10_64 > > > Best Regards! > Peixiu Hou Thanks! change status to verified according to comment#9 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-2609.html |