Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 1249010
the package nodejs-js-beautify doesn't pack the python library from the same source code
Last modified: 2017-08-08 08:04:17 EDT
Description of problem:
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Steps to Reproduce:
1. download code from https://github.com/beautify-web/js-beautify
2. see there is also python library of the same
3. see that it is not packaged by the package
python part of the code is not packaged
package should provide all the possible use-cases from the same source to avoid duplication of packages/sources.
This would be useful for at least mitmproxy and bluefish, which have the library currently embedded.
They must not be built from the same source since the nodejs package needs to be ExclusiveArched and cannot be overridden in pythonx- subpackages.
Then perhaps the nodejs package should be sub-package?
I do not see how to make *only some* subpackages ExclusiveArch'd. I tried this:
and if I set arch_override = ppc64 (where the Python package should build fine), the build fails:
Am I missing something?
If you add some conditional to skip build the node code in ppc?
run python code
no run nodejs code
Perhaps try %ifarch/%ifnarch rather than ExclusiveArch?
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 24 development cycle.
Changing version to '24'.
More information and reason for this action is here:
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
This message is a reminder that Fedora 24 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 2 (two) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 24. It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time
this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version'
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version'
to a later Fedora version.
Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not
able to fix it before Fedora 24 is end of life. If you would still like
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version
of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.
Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes
bugs or makes them obsolete.
Fedora 24 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2017-08-08. Fedora 24 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.
If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.