Bug 1250345 - [7.1.z] instack plugin is missing.
Summary: [7.1.z] instack plugin is missing.
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: sos
Version: 7.0 (Kilo)
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: z2
: 7.0 (Kilo)
Assignee: Lee Yarwood
QA Contact: Prasanth Anbalagan
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1250448
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-08-05 08:12 UTC by Leonid Natapov
Modified: 2023-02-22 23:02 UTC (History)
14 users (show)

Fixed In Version: sos-3.2-16.el7ost.5
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-10-08 12:22:01 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2015:1875 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Red Hat Enterprise Linux OpenStack Platform Bug Fix and Enhancement Advisory 2015-10-08 16:11:27 UTC

Description Leonid Natapov 2015-08-05 08:12:48 UTC
Instack plugin is missing for sosreport.

Comment 4 Bryn M. Reeves 2015-08-05 08:42:27 UTC
It's not missing: it does not exist upstream.

To get into an RH build it first needs to go there.

Comment 7 Prasanth Anbalagan 2015-09-30 12:52:05 UTC
Verified as follows,

[root@artyom-rhevm33 ~]# yum list installed | grep sos
sos.noarch                           3.2-16.el7ost.5         @rhelosp-7.0-puddle
[root@artyom-rhevm33 ~]# 
[root@artyom-rhevm33 ~]# 
[root@artyom-rhevm33 ~]# rpm -ql sos | grep instack
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sos/plugins/openstack_instack.py
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sos/plugins/openstack_instack.pyc
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sos/plugins/openstack_instack.pyo
[root@artyom-rhevm33 ~]#

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2015-10-08 12:22:01 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015:1875


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.