Description of problem: I was having what I though might be a GRUB problem (may still be), and then I read the release notes that says you must have a processor that supports EM64T. Is this true? If it is, then Anaconda should test for and report if you are trying to intall it on an unsupported processor. Why is Fedora limited to such a miniscule subset of highest end processors??? From Intel: Q3: Which Intel processors support Intel® EM64T and when will they be available? A3: On February 17th, 2004, Intel announced the company will add Intel® EM64T to its IA-32 processors code named Nocona (future Intel® Xeon⢠processor for dual processing servers and workstations), Potomac (future Intel Xeon processor MP for multi-processing servers) and Prescott (future product for uni-processor servers and workstations). This was an initial technology disclosure. Intel will provide additional details as the introductions of these various products approach. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install on pentium 3 2. 3. Actual results: Hangs at GRUB text screen. Expected results: Should boot! Additional info: This may in fact be a GRUB issue. GRUB never makes it to the graphical screen (it hangs after outputing "GRUB" in text mode), which is before the kernel is loaded. But I don't want to waste time trying to get this to work on an unsupported processor. Anaconda should test for and report that the existing processor is not supported.
OK, re-checked download, and I definately got the i386 images. Not the x86-64 images. So the "release notes" for Fedora Core 2 listed on the website (http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/release-notes/) incorrectly state that a EM65T equipped processor is required. (OK, I know I should have checked the release notes on the discs first, but hey.) I will re-address this issue with the GRUB group, now that I know my processor is supported...
Bill -- not sure why the x86_64 release notes are the ones posted.
Ed/Elliot - did we post the wrong relnotes?
Bill -- sure looks like it; it only lists AMD64 and EM64T, so it is, in fact, the x86_64 version...
This was fixed around the FC3 timeframe.